Crosby, Letang pleased with recovery
> > Center Sidney Crosby and defenseman Kris Letang, both of whom returned to the lineup Thursday after dealing with head injuries, were pleased with how they responded while playing three games in four days.
Crosby was held without a point against the Flyers on Sunday but looked dangerous at times and just missed the net on a golden opportunity to score in overtime. He finished with three shots and won 11 of 21 faceoffs.
"I had a couple of chances in overtime," Crosby said. "Just need to execute, and hopefully those will go in. Give their goalie credit. He made some good saves."
Defenseman Kris Letang was likely the Penguins' best player yesterday. He had assists on each of their goals and raced from behind the play to break up a two-on-one in overtime.
Letang finished with three assists and was plus-6 on the road trip.
"They were good battles," Letang said. "It was fun to get back in there."
> > Center Joe Vitale did not play against the Flyers after injuring his right shoulder in the second period on Saturday against New Jersey. He was replaced in the lineup by right wing Arron Asham, who returned after missing Saturday because of illness.
> > The Penguins' healthy scratches included center Richard Park, center Dustin Jeffrey and defenseman Ben Lovejoy. Goalie Brent Johnson, who did not make the road trip, remains out with an unknown injury.
> > The Penguins will not practice today and return to action Tuesday at home against Winnipeg.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.