With Pirates' winning ways, tickets not as easy to come by
For Greg Boerio of McCandless, memories of the days when the Pirates came off an All-Star break steamrolling toward a winning season are difficult to recollect.
"I turned 7 during the summer of 1992, so I mostly remember how excited my grandfather and father were about the team that year," said Boerio, 25, as he tailgated with several friends before Monday's game against the Cincinnati Reds.
"I was raised to support the hometown team, so it hasn't been easy. But I'm loving it this year. I'm really flying high and feeling very optimistic," he said.
While scoring a ticket to last night's game wasn't all that difficult, some fans -- especially those traveling from out of town -- didn't take any chances.
"We originally planned to just come out to the ballpark before the game and buy tickets, but when we got here today and saw all the people, we decided to order them so we didn't miss out," said Bill Rahrig, 42, a "die-hard" Steelers fan who drove from Payne, Ohio, near the Indiana border with his wife, Cindy, and daughter, Paige, 14, to see Heinz Field and watch the Pirates play.
The Rahrigs' caution might well have been warranted, considering that even after a 45-minute rain delay, PNC Park was nearly two-thirds full at the start of the game.
Not bad for a Monday night, and unheard of in this century.
Mark Witkowski, 24, of Millvale has been to nearly 20 games this year.
"I don't care if I end up with a standing room ticket or if I have to get them from a scalper," Witkowski said.
"I supported the Pirates back when they didn't do so well, so now that they are winning, I'm really stoked."
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.