Share This Page

Pens' Eaton preaches one game at a time

D Mark Eaton promised to "deliver all the usual cliches" Monday after the Penguins practiced at Southpointe.

The subject was the Penguins' inability to win three consecutive games since opening November with six straight victories, and Eaton delivered on his pledge. He also stressed that thinking of a winning streak is dangerous — even though interim coach Dan Bylsma acknowledged victories in two of every three games over the club's final 21 contests "probably" won't be enough to reach the playoffs.

"We can't afford to think anything more than one game at a time, one period at a time, really," Eaton said. "But, yeah, we're going to need to string something together at some point. We just can't let ourselves lose sight of playing the (New York) Islanders on Wednesday."

• LWs Matt Cooke and Ruslan Fedotenko did not practice yesterday, and their status to play at home against the Islanders is uncertain.

"It's that time of the year where some guys need a day off and to be evaluated," Bylsma said. "We may see them on the ice today, and we may not. I don't know, to be honest."

• Bylsma said he is no more worried about possible mental and physical fatigue for G Marc-Andre Fleury than he is "any other player." Fleury was pulled Sunday from a 5-2 loss at Washington; he has appeared in 29 of 31 games since returning from a one-month, injury-related absence Dec. 18. He has allowed 21 goals in the past six games, including five Sunday.

"After the game I was tired, but I came home and sat on the couch all night," Fleury said. "Physically I'm good." Bylsma has not named a starter for Wednesday.

DIGITs

115,000 — Money raised by the NHLPA for the Luc Bourdon Memorial Fund; Bourdon, a former Vancouver prospect and best friend of Penguins D Kris Letang, was killed last June in a motorcycle accident.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.