Share This Page

NHL playoff schedule

FIRST ROUND (Best-of-7)

EASTERN CONFERENCE

PENGUINS VS. PHILADELPHIA

Penguins win series, 4-2

BOSTON VS. MONTREAL

Boston wins series, 4-0

WASHINGTON VS. N.Y. RANGERS

Washington wins series, 4-3

NEW JERSEY VS. CAROLINA

Carolina wins series, 4-3

WESTERN CONFERENCE

SAN JOSE VS. ANAHEIM

Anaheim wins series, 4-2

DETROIT VS. COLUMBUS

Detroit wins series, 4-0

VANCOUVER VS. ST. LOUIS

Vancouver wins series, 4-0

CHICAGO VS. CALGARY

Chicago wins series, 4-2

CONFERENCE SEMIFINALS (Best-of-7)

EASTERN CONFERENCE

CAROLINA VS. BOSTON

Carolina wins series, 4-3

WASHINGTON VS. PENGUINS

Penguins win series, 4-3

WESTERN CONFERENCE

DETROIT VS. ANAHEIM

Detroit wins series, 4-3

VANCOUVER VS. CHICAGO

Chicago wins series, 4-2

CONFERENCE FINALS (Best-of-7)

EASTERN CONFERENCE

CAROLINA VS. PENGUINS

May 18: Penguins 3, Carolina 2

May 21: Penguins 7, Carolina 4

May 23: Penguins 6, Carolina 2

May 26: Penguins 4, Carolina 1, Penguins win series, 4-0

WESTERN CONFERENCE

CHICAGO VS. DETROIT

May 17: Detroit 5, Chicago 2

May 19: Detroit 3, Chicago 2, OT

May 22: Chicago 4, Detroit 3, OT

May 24: Detroit 6, Chicago 1

May 27: Detroit 2, Chicago 1, OT, Detroit wins series, 4-1

STANLEY CUP FINALS (Best-of-7)

DETROIT VS. PENGUINS

May 30: Detroit 3, Penguins 1

May 31: Detroit 3, Penguins 1

June 2: Penguins 4, Detroit 2

June 4: Penguins 4, Detroit 2

June 6: Detroit 5, Penguins 0

June 9: Penguins 2, Detroit 1

Friday, June 12: Penguins 2, Detroit 1, Penguins win series, 4-3

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.