Share This Page

Steelers' Ward treated for broken nose

Toughness has never been an issue with Hines Ward, which the Steelers wide receiver proved again Sunday.

Ward broke his nose in the Steelers' 27-13 win over the Philadelphia but never mentioned the injury after the game.

He had minor surgery to correct the problem after the Steelers practiced Tuesday, team spokesman Dave Lockett said.

Steelers coach Mike Tomlin has not ruled out Ward playing in the Steelers' final preseason game Thursday night at Carolina.

Ward did not appear to be in any pain or discomfort as he talked to reporters following Sunday night's game. He was, in fact, one of the last players to leave the locker room.

Ward watched practice with his left thigh wrapped in ice and didn't have any marks or discoloration near his nose. It was assumed he had a problem with his quadriceps, and a minor one at that, since Ward appeared to be in good spirits and stayed close to Tomlin's side.

That is why no one pressed Tomlin at his news conference after he dismissed Ward missing practice as "Hines is Hines."

On Ward playing in the 8 p.m. game Thursday, Tomlin said, "I wouldn't count Hines out."

Tomlin said the starters will play "roughly a quarter" against the Panthers. He added that there will be some exceptions, which presumably means starting quarterback Ben Roethlisberger won't play more than a couple of series.

Along with Ward, there is a question of whether tight ends Heath Miller and Jerame Tuman will play Thursday.

Miller has some shoulder discomfort, Tomlin said, while Tuman is still battling a back problem.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.