Share This Page

Steelers apologize for skipping anthem

The Steelers apologized Tuesday for omitting a performance of the national anthem by Motley Crue lead singer Vince Neil before the nationally televised game against the Miami Dolphins at Heinz Field.

The National Football League and the Steelers decided Monday night to forgo the anthem -- which traditionally opens sporting events in America -- after torrential rain and lightning forced a 25-minute weather delay.

"Our guys were going to send the singer out to sing immediately after they were sending the teams back on (the field)," said Steelers president Art Rooney II. "I said, 'Well, wait, because there's nobody in the stands. There's no sense in singing it when everybody's standing in the concourse.' So they waited, and the league and the network said, 'Well, now we don't have a window.' "

Greg Aiello, NFL senior vice president of public relations, said NFL representatives at the game decided to shorten pre-game warmups and other activities in order to kick off as quickly as possible.

American Legion national spokeswoman Ramona Joyce said the omission was unfortunate.

"It's a shame, if they had to make cuts, that that would be it," Joyce said. "That's the one thing everyone seems to do in unison at a game."

Veterans of Foreign Wars national spokesman Joe Davis said they weren't going to beat up on the Steelers organization "because they're wonderful to our veterans and our service members."

But, he said, "They should have still sung the national anthem because that's what we do in America, regardless of network air time. I'm sure a lesson has been learned and it won't happen again, and that's the most we can ever ask."

With the exception of the Super Bowl, national anthems rarely are part of televised NFL game broadcasts.

Steelers spokesman Dave Lockett said the organization received a few calls on the subject.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.