Share This Page

Former Steelers DE Banaszak recovering

Former Steelers defensive end John Banaszak is expected to recover after suffering a hemorrhage on the surface of his brain, doctors at Allegheny General Hospital said Friday.

Banaszak, 58, fell ill Wednesday afternoon, when he complained of neck pain and headaches, said his oldest son, Jay Banaszak. He initially was taken to Washington Hospital and later transferred to AGH, where he's expected to remain for a week to 10 days.

"The expectation is that he'll get better," Dr. Khaled Aziz, an AGH neurosurgeon, said yesterday during a news briefing at the North Side hospital.

Banaszak, a member of three Steelers' Super Bowl championship teams, was awake and alert yesterday morning. Preliminary tests have ruled out an aneurysm, which doctors initially suspected.

The type of bleed Banaszak suffered is called a nonaneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, Aziz said. It isn't uncommon in people who take aspirin, a blood-thinner.

Banaszak, who played for the Steelers from 1975-81 and now works as an assistant football coach at Robert Morris, has a history of neck pain.

His wife, son and two daughters were with him at the hospital. He's been overwhelmed by messages of support and well-wishes from the Pittsburgh community, including former Steelers teammates, said the son, Jay Banaszak, 35.

"There's a lot of love in the family," he said. "It's a pretty big, tight-knit family."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.