Share This Page

Pitt's Estermyer, Davis find NFL homes

Pitt long snapper Mark Estermyer has agreed to a free-agent contract with the Steelers, while Panthers guard-center C.J. Davis will sign with the Carolina Panthers.

Estermyer, a 6-foot-2, 245-pounder, was a walk-on from Blackhawk High who earned a scholarship with the Panthers. He is expected to compete with Greg Warren for the long-snapper job, with incumbent Jared Retkofsky injured.

"It's a done deal," Estermyer said. "I'm pretty excited. The Steelers were the main people that contacted me, so I decided to go with them. I've been a Steelers fan my whole life. This is a great opportunity, so hopefully I can go in and show what I can do. Whether it's to compete with Greg or give him a break, I'm going to do my best."

Davis, a 6-foot-2, 300-pounder from West Allegheny, was disappointed that he wasn't drafted after being a four-year starter at left guard before switching to center at midseason last fall. Davis will join the Panthers, which drafted former Pitt tackle Jeff Otah in the first round last year.

"I'm feeling pretty good about it," Davis said. "Hopefully, I can come in and work a miracle, like I did at Pitt."

In other free-agent news, Pitt punter Dave Brytus, a West Allegheny graduate, said he has agreed to a free-agent deal with the Baltimore Ravens. The 6-foot-4, 225-pound Brytus spent his first two seasons at Purdue – where he was a candidate for the Ray Guy Award as the nation's top punter – before transferring to Pitt in 2006.

Penn State outside linebacker Tyrell Sales, a Butler High School graduate, said he has agreed to a free-agent deal with the Indianapolis Colts. Sales said Penn State defensive end Maurice Evans is expected to sign a free-agent deal with the N.Y. Giants.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.