Share This Page

No decision yet from Steelers on safety Clark

Coach Mike Tomlin said starting free safety Ryan Clark's status is still in question for the Steelers' game Monday night in Denver. Doctors have cleared Clark, whose sickle-cell trait and the low altitude in Denver resulted in life-threatening complications two seasons ago, to play against the Broncos.

Tomlin said Tuesday that the Steelers and Clark are still weighing the risks of the eight-year veteran playing in Denver. Tomlin said a final decision won't be made until later in the week.

"We're going to make the decision once, and then we're going to play football," Tomlin said.

· Santonio Holmes also has the sickle-cell trait, but the wide receiver is not susceptible to what Clark suffered in 2007 when the Steelers last played in Denver.

"The difference is, in less than one percent of the people that have it will have the reaction that I had," Clark said. "I just happened to be one of the lucky ones, to be in that one percent. God bless (Holmes) that he doesn't have to go through that and that he can play. It's just different for different people."

· In addition to defensive end Travis Kirschke (calf strain), outside linebacker Lawrence Timmons (sprained ankle) is questionable for Monday night's game, Tomlin said.

Offensive lineman Ramon Foster may be limited in practice this week because of back discomfort. Outside linebacker Andre Frazier, a key special-teams player, is expected to suit up in Denver after missing the past two games because of a thigh contusion.

Of the Steelers' overall health, Tomlin said, "We're doing pretty good."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.