Steelers sign free agents Allen, Battle
The Steelers have signed safety Will Allen and wide receiver Arnaz Battle to three-year contracts. Allen, who had been with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, could be a possible replacement for Ryan Clark at free safety if the latter signs with another team.
"I'm just going to do what they ask," Allen, who played only eight games last season because of a thumb injury. "I thought it was a great fit. I thought it was time for a change. What better place to be than in Pittsburgh?"
Both Allen and Battle, who had been with the San Francisco 49ers, have excelled on special teams throughout their career.
Battle could also provide depth at wide receiver, especially since the Steelers don't have much of that behind Hines Ward, Santonio Holmes and Mike Wallace.
"I'm just coming in and competing," Battle said. "I felt it was a great fit for me. It fits my style of play, the physical, hard-nosed type football. One of the things that attracted me to them was I was able to do so many different things."
In other Steelers news, the team has expressed interest in bringing Larry Foote back to Pittsburgh. The Steelers are trying to gauge what interest Foote would have in returning to Pittsburgh.
Also, free agent offensive tackle Jonathan Scott is scheduled to meet with the Steelers tomorrow. Foote started at inside linebacker from 2004-08 for the Steelers. The Steelers released Foote last spring at his request because he envisioned Lawrence Timmons playing a bigger role n 2009 at his expense.
Foote played for the Detroit Lions last season but is a free agent.
Scott played for the Buffalo Bills last season. New Steelers offensive line coach Sean Kugler coached the Bills' line before coming to Pittsburgh.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.