Share This Page

Sepulveda gives Steelers an option on kickoffs

Punter Daniel Sepulveda has been working on kickoffs for years now, and Steelers coach Mike Tomlin finally let him show off what he had.

In front of more than 12,000 fans at Latrobe's Memorial Stadium Friday night, Tomlin called on his punter to kick off during the second special teams period of the night.

Sepulveda kicked off four times during the session, to the liking of Tomlin.

"Sepulveda may provide us with a legitimate option there," Tomlin said.

Kicker Jeff Reed handled the duties earlier in practice, however, since the Steelers have only one kicker in camp, Tomlin relied on Sepulveda to kick the second session.

• Ben Roethlisberger was the last man off the bus heading into Memorial Stadium and received a huge ovation from the overflowing crowd.

• The featured drill of the night was backs on backers, with the highlight being at the end when Tomlin directed rookies Jonathan Dwyer and Thaddeus Gibson to go up against each other four consecutive times.

Gibson won the first two while Dwyer held his own over the final two. Other winners included Sean McHugh and a surprise entrant Ryan Mundy.

• During a red-zone drill, Dennis Dixon failed to complete a pass. He missed on all five of his attempts, including getting intercepted by Joe Burnett.

• Rookie Maurkice Pouncey was the main wedge buster during kickoff drills while Stefan Logan continued to run with the first team kickoff and Burnett second team.

• DB Tuff Harris (shoulder) and DT Sunny Harris (foot) both left practice early with injuries.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.