Adapt and overcome: Steelers march on without Smith
The triceps injury that Aaron Smith suffered in the Steelers' 23-22 win against the Dolphins may not just end his season.
It could also signal the end of an era for the player that may be the standard for 3-4 defensive ends.
Smith is 34, and he has had three major injuries in the last four years.
Juxtapose that with Smith not missing a game from 2000-05, and it suggests that his body is breaking down after more than a decade of mixing it up with 300-pound offensive linemen -- and usually more than one of them at a time, as Smith is frequently double-teamed.
Perhaps that is why outside linebacker James Harrison said of Smith's latest injury, "It's got to be heartbreaking for him."
It could be for the Steelers too.
The Steelers (5-1) will only go as far as their defense takes them. And what makes the loss of Smith potentially devastating is that the Steelers are a different defense without the 13th-year veteran.
In the 11 games Smith missed last season with a rotator cuff injury, the Steelers yielded 98.4 rushing yards per game. With the 6-foot-5, 298-pounder, the Steelers gave up just an average of 71 rushing yards to opponents.
The drop off in 2007 when Smith suffered a season-ending biceps injury was even more severe. In the 13 games that he played, the Steelers held opponents to 72.6 rushing yards a game. That number spiked to 157.3 in the four games that Smith was out.
There were other factors as to why the Steelers weren't nearly as good against the run after losing Smith in 2009 and 2007. But what is relevant as the Steelers move forward is that they cobble together a rotation that can do a credible job at left defensive end.
That means Ziggy Hood, a protege of Smith, shows why the Steelers made him a first-round draft pick in 2009.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.