Steelers Bettis, Dawson among Hall finalists
Jerome Bettis and Dermontti Dawson are at the doorstep of football immortality.
The former Steelers are among the 15 modern-day finalists for the Pro Football Hall of Fame that includes former Allderdice High and Pitt standout Curtis Martin and Chris Doleman, who also starred at Pitt.
Two senior nominees also will be considered during the vote Feb. 5, the day before Super Bowl XLV.
A nominee must receive at least 80 percent of the vote from the 44-person selection committee to gain entrance into the Hall of Fame. No fewer than four people -- and no more than seven -- are inducted every year.
Bettis and Martin, as well as running back Marshall Faulk and cornerback Deion Sanders, are among the former players that are finalists in their first year of eligibility.
Martin and Bettis are fourth and fifth on the NFL's all-time rushing list with 14,101 yards and 13,662 yards, respectively.
Dawson, a Hall of Fame finalist last year, is considered one of the greatest centers of all time.
One of four finalists who played with the same team his entire career, Dawson made the Pro Bowl seven consecutive seasons (1992-98). He was a first-team All-Pro pick from 1992-97.
Here are those announced as finalists for the Pro Football Hall of Fame
• Jerome Bettis, RB
• Tim Brown, WR
• Cris Carter, WR
• Dermontti Dawson, C
• Richard Dent, DE
• Chris Doleman, DE
• Marshall Faulk, RB
• Charles Haley, DE
• *Chris Hanburger, LB
• Cortez Kennedy, DT
• Curtis Martin, RB
• Andre Reed, WR
• *Les Richter, LB
• Willie Roaf, OT
• **Ed Sabol
• Deion Sanders, CB/RS
• Shannon Sharpe, TE
**Nominated as a special contributor
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.