Share This Page

Steady on his feet, Steelers' Ward shines

As tough and gritty as they come in the NFL, Hines Ward is a throwback to a classic era of football known for leather helmets, bloody knuckles and knock-'em-flat hits.

Turns out the Steelers receiver is a smash as a classical dancer, too.

In Week 4 of "Dancing With the Stars" -- dubbed Classical Week -- Ward and partner, Kym Johnson, earned their second straight score of 25 (out of a possible 30) for their smooth Paso Doble routine Monday night. The pair received a nine from judge Carrie Ann Inaba and eights from Len Goodman and Bruno Tonioli, with their total placing them in second for the night, one point behind the duo of Disney star Chelsea Kane and Mark Ballas.

"You are the most determined of all of our celebrities," Goodman said. "You come out every week 100 percent. Keep it up. This competition, the longer it goes, the tougher it gets. Work hard because you are really doing great."

Upon ending their performance -- one punctuated with pyrotechnics throughout -- Ward and Johnson garnered a standing ovation from the crowd, including Ward's Terrible Towel-waving Steeler teammates James Farrior, James Harrison and Max Starks.

But the crowd turned to boos when the pair's scores came in, seemingly expecting higher marks from Goodman and Tonioli.

"You were in the zone, my friend," Inaba said. "You nailed it."

Not unlike Ward's comments before his Week 2 Quickstep routine, the Super Bowl XL MVP expressed some reservations in practice for the paso doble -- Spanish for "two step" -- as shown in an introductory clip. Saying he succeeded in previous weeks by timing his steps to lyrics, Ward thought dancing to a live orchestra would provide a challenge.

There weren't any false steps once he hit the stage.

"It was very tough," Ward said in his post-dance interview with Brooke Burke. "I had never listened to classical music before, but it was awesome."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.