Elder Rooney to stay out of NFL labor dispute
Dan Rooney, a key figure in maintaining labor peace in the NFL for more than two decades, has no plans to try and broker a Collective Bargaining Agreement between the owners and players.
"Nope," the Steelers chairman emeritus said today after a screening of the Steelers' 2010 highlight film at Heinz Field. "Art's involved. He knows what to do."
Rooney, whose son Art Rooney II is the Steelers' president, reiterated the stance he took prior to the Super Bowl in late January. That came roughly six weeks before negotiations on a new CBA broke down and the owners locked out the players.
Rooney's reason for staying on the sidelines during the NFL's first work stoppage since 1987 is simple: his regular job takes up too much of his time.
Rooney is the US. Ambassador to Ireland, and it is a job that he said he will "probably" stay in for another year. Rooney is in Pittsburgh for a week before returning to Ireland.
Friday marked a significant day on the labor front as both sides made arguments to an appeals court in St. Louis. The players are trying to get an injunction that would temporarily end the lockout. The owners, meanwhile, want to keep it in place and put pressure on the players to reach a settlement through negotiations.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.