Share This Page

Steelers LB Harrison thinks he'll see Ravens

James Harrison has yet to be cleared for game action, but that could change later this week when the Steelers' outside linebacker will undergo another evaluation on his surgically repaired right orbital bone.

The Steelers will then make a determination whether Harrison will play Sunday against the Ravens at Heinz Field.

"I hope so, but that's up to the doctors to clear me for game play," Harrison said. "If they say I can go, I'll be out there (playing). If not, then I'll wait another week."

Harrison has missed the past four games after suffering his injury against Houston on Oct. 2. Team doctors cleared him Monday for practice but have yet to let him take part in contact drills.

Harrison practiced yesterday and said he took part in individual drills, lined up as a scout team linebacker and took some first-team reps.

"It just felt good to be back out there practicing," Harrison said. "Not really too much, so we kept it low so I can work back into it. I'm just trying to get back into game shape."

Harrison said his double vision has eased, but some light sensitivity remains. Harrison will wear a tinted visor when he returns.

But the biggest issue that remains for Harrison is contact, which he knows won't come until he's back on the field for a game.

"I want to see what that actually feels like (to get hit), but I don't think they're going to let me do that (this week)," Harrison said.

Harrison could be used in a specialty role of rushing the passer if he is cleared before Sunday, especially if LaMarr Woodley's hamstring prevents him from playing this week. Woodley was limited in practice yesterday.

"Once I get cleared, then it really doesn't matter," Harrison said. "I don't care what they want me to do."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.