Steelers' Woodley hopes to return for Chiefs
Steelers outside linebacker LaMarr Woodley is cautiously optimistic that he will return to action Nov. 27 when the Steelers visit Kansas City for a prime-time game.
"I'll be back hopefully after the bye week," Woodley said Tuesday.
Woodley has missed the past two games, and the hamstring injury he sustained Oct. 30 has kept him in something of a holding pattern. The Steelers' bye gives Woodley an extra week to heal, and the fifth-year veteran will get to enjoy some time off like the rest of his teammates.
The Steelers hold their final practice of the week Wednesday, and the players are off until Monday. Woodley said he plans to return to his native Michigan rather than stay in Pittsburgh for treatment.
"You can't do much about it but let it rest up," Woodley said of his injury. "It's almost like a broken arm, (and it will heal) whether I'm here or at Michigan."
> > The Steelers may not be at full strength at wide receiver when they return from the bye. Wide receiver Emmanuel Sanders is still limping noticeably after undergoing knee surgery last week. When asked if he expects to play against the Chiefs, Sanders said, "We'll play it by ear."
> > The Steelers went from third place to first in the AFC North on Sunday by virtue of their win over the Bengals and the Ravens' loss in Seattle. Woodley said the way the season is shaking out, the Steelers could get an opportunity to avenge two losses to the Ravens in the playoffs. Woodley is sure of one thing: The Steelers are bound for the playoffs. "We're going to be playing football in January," he said.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.