ShareThis Page

Pittsburgh Symphony Orchestra waltzes back into Heinz Hall

| Wednesday, Nov. 21, 2012, 8:52 p.m.
Pianist Yefim Bronfman
Credit: Pittsburgh Symphony
Pianist Yefim Bronfman Credit: Pittsburgh Symphony

Just three weeks ago, Manfred Honeck and the musicians of the Pittsburgh Symphony were in residence at the Musikverein in Vienna. They resume classical concerts at Heinz Hall this week with a program of Viennese music.

The symphony's music director always looks forward to the Thanksgiving weekend at Heinz Hall because he's established the tradition of devoting the second half to music of the Strauss family — the waltzes and polkas that the Vienna Philharmonic offers at its televised New Year's Day concerts.

Honeck will conduct the Pittsburgh Symphony Orchestra at concerts Friday through Sunday at Heinz Hall, Downtown. The program is Ludwig van Beethoven's Piano Concerto No. 5 (“Emperor”), with Yefim Bronfman as soloist, along with music of the Strauss family.

The repertoire features Johann Strauss Jr.'s best-known piece, the “On the beautiful, blue Danube” waltzes, which Honeck will conduct for the first time with the symphony.

“I'm really looking forward to doing it with the orchestra,” he says. “(The orchestra) is very into playing Viennese waltz, knows what I want and is aware of the stylistic things going on.”

Water is the thematic link between the pieces that will be played, including the “A Night in Venice” Overture and Josef Strauss' Skating Polka. Baritone Gregg Baker will sing Franz Lehar's “Volga Song” and Henry Mancini's “Moon River.”

Bronfman last performed with Honeck at Heinz Hall in remarkable performances of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart's Piano Concerto No. 24 in May 2009, and has had “wonderful” experiences with him in other repertoire with other orchestras.

Honeck “is very much a personality when he works with the soloist, definitely not taking second fiddle,” the pianist says. “He definitely has an opinion, and that's what we have to work with. I think it's good. It gives the performance a degree of vibrancy, which under the different circumstance of a passive accompaniment cannot happen.”

Beethoven's “Emperor” Concerto” was first performed in Vienna in 1811 during the city's occupation by the French army of Napoleon. It may have gotten its nickname at the premiere, when a French soldier is said to have shouted out “Vive L'Empereur” after a martial passage in the music. Beethoven would not have been happy. It was precisely when Beethoven heard Napoleon had crowned himself emperor that the composer turned against him and scratched out his dedication of the Symphony No. 3 (“Eroica”) for choosing the tyrant's path.

The concerto is the last of Beethoven's five for piano that Bronfman learned.

“For many, it's the first one to learn, because it's the most outgoing. For me, I did it backwards,” Bronfman says. He's been playing it for 25 years now and made CDs and DVDs of the Beethoven concerti over the summer with the Concertgebouw Orchestra of Amsterdam, Netherland, conducted by Andris Nelsons.

“The music has the quality of heroic bravado, yet what is more fascinating to me is how he uses the simplest of means. I think it's probably very experimental Beethoven. Even in today's terms, it is a very modern piece to me,” Bronfman says. “There is more than imagination, there is a genius that makes such great sonorities.”

The pianist suspects a “secret message of a soldier” in some high repeated notes at the start of the first movement, a kind of code that later composer Robert Schumann used in his music for communicating with his wife and friends. He also believes that Schumann was influenced by the concerto's second movement in the finale of his Fantasia for solo piano.

Mark Kanny is classical music critic for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7877 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.