ShareThis Page

More charges expected in Fayette methadone clinic 'pill mill' case

Renatta Signorini
| Tuesday, March 29, 2016, 11:00 p.m.
FBI agents work at tAddiction Specialists Inc. in the Mountain View Plaza on Route 51 in North Union on Thursday, Oct. 8, 2015.
Evan Sanders | Tribune-Review
FBI agents work at tAddiction Specialists Inc. in the Mountain View Plaza on Route 51 in North Union on Thursday, Oct. 8, 2015.

More charges may be coming for the director of a Fayette County methadone clinic indicted in January for allegedly operating a “pill mill,” according to federal court filings.

An attorney for Rosalind Sugarmann, 64, of Allison Park wrote in a motion filed Monday that a grand jury could hand down a superseding indictment related to the alleged illegal distribution of prescription pain pills and Suboxone, which is used to treat opiate addiction.

Sugarmann and cardiologist Dominic W. Dileo, 67, of Uniontown were indicted in January on 237 counts of conspiring to operate as a “pill mill” since 2013. Federal and local agents raided Addiction Specialists Inc. in the Mountain View Plaza on Route 51 in North Union in the fall.

Afterward, the state Department of Drug and Alcohol Programs directed the clinic's clients to seek treatment at other licensed facilities.

In a filing seeking an extension to file pretrial motions in Sugarmann's case, attorney Efrem Grail wrote that the prosecutor has indicated he is expecting the superseding indictment to be handed down “fairly soon.”

“Assistant U.S. Attorney (Shawn) Sweeney confirmed on March 21 ... that he believed ‘it would be a waste of everyone's time and resources to start litigating pretrial motions at this point ...' in light of the pending superseding indictments,” Grail wrote in the motion.

Judge Nora Barry Fischer granted the motion and gave Grail until May 12 to file pretrial motions.

The current indictment alleges that Dileo “did knowingly, intentionally and unlawfully dispense and distribute and cause to be dispensed and distributed, as aided and abetted by Rosalind Sugarmann, a quantity of ... Suboxone ... outside the usual course of professional practice and not for a legitimate medical purpose.”

Sugarmann and Dileo are charged with a combined 38 counts of unlawfully distributing Suboxone between March 17 and Nov. 24, 2015; 194 counts of unlawfully dispensing and distributing Suboxone between January 2013 and July 2015; and a count of conspiracy.

Dileo also is charged with four counts of conspiracy to unlawfully distribute Xanax between January 2013 and November 2015.

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 724-837-5374 or rsignorini@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.