ShareThis Page

Review: Dragon tattoo girl is back in print

| Saturday, Sept. 16, 2017, 2:24 p.m.

Sometimes, death isn't the end. Sometimes, after the heart of a great mystery writer stops beating, his or her characters raise a glass in tribute, and then continue down the mean streets of their series.

Of course, that's just an illusion created by some talented pros standing in the shadows. For instance, the literary novelist John Banville (under the pen name Benjamin Black) has carried on the adventures of Philip Marlowe. Suspense queen Sophie Hannah has recharged those “little grey cells” of Agatha Christie's Hercule Poirot. And hard-boiled masters Ace Atkins and Reed Farrel Coleman, respectively, have rebooted Robert B. Parker's Spenser and Jesse Stone series.

When Stieg Larsson died in 2004 — before his three completed Lisbeth Salander novels were published and became international phenomena — it seemed as though the goth girl with the dragon tattoo was predestined to make a limited appearance in print. But the novels were too successful and Salander's fans were too fervent. So it was that Swedish journalist and author David Lagercrantz was chosen by Larsson's estate to extend the Millennium series with a fourth adventure, “The Girl in the Spider's Web.”

Though purists were skeptical, that novel received terrific reviews, many praising Lagercrantz for evoking Larsson's numbed noir atmosphere while eradicating the worst of his stylistic tics (among them: robotic dialogue and neurotic attention to his characters' coffee consumption).

“The Girl Who Takes an Eye for an Eye,” Lagercrantz's latest Salander novel, is even bolder — if somewhat more fantastical. It takes Salander on an extended quest into her origins.

The story opens with a quintessential image of Salander: She's entering a small room and closing the door. Radically self-contained, Salander is never more herself than when she's alone, working on mathematical problems such as “loop quantum gravity theory.” Yet over the course of the series, Salander's autonomy has been complicated by relationships with, among others, journalist Mikael Blomkvist and his sister, lawyer Annika Giannini, as well as by her one vulnerability: She cannot bear to see bullies torment their victims.

The room Salander is entering is, in fact, a prison cell. She's serving a two-month sentence for questionable actions she undertook (in the preceding novel) to safeguard a gifted autistic child who had witnessed a murder. On the way into her cell, Salander notes that a fellow inmate — a beautiful Bangladeshi woman named Faria — is being roughed up by the prison's resident sadist, a woman who's dubbed herself “Benito” (after Mussolini). Salander eventually intervenes and puts Benito temporarily out of business. At the same time, she grows more curious about the religiously sanctified abuse that drove gentle Faria over the edge and landed her in prison for murder.

Meanwhile, on the outside, Holger Palmgren, Salander's elderly former guardian, receives a surprise visit from a stranger who once was a secretary at the children's psychiatric clinic where Salander spent some of her grimmest years. The woman has read newspaper accounts of Salander's recent exploits and has decided to turn over some of the clinic's documents to Palmgren. In them, there's a reference to something known as “The Registry.”

Salander, along with Palmgren and Blomkvist, becomes convinced that this “Registry” holds clues not only to her identity but to a larger crime perpetrated decades ago in Sweden against children of ethnic minorities. As usual, a little knowledge proves to be a dangerous thing, and this investigation concludes, not only with justice restored, but also with a funeral.

Maureen Corrigan, who teaches literature at Georgetown University, is the book critic for the NPR program “Fresh Air.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.