'Best book' may be acquired taste
What can you say about a book The New York Times Magazine has heralded as “the best book you'll read this year”? That maybe it's not?
And what can you say when its author is being named the “rightful heir” to Donald Barthelme, Kurt Vonnegut and Mark Twain? That maybe he's not?
Even so, George Saunders and his fourth short-story collection, “Tenth of December,” are on a literary ride most authors can only dream about.
NPR's Maureen Corrigan is unabashedly on board, after admitting she thought it would be satisfying to “topple” such Olympian pronouncements. “ ‘Tenth of December' probably will turn out to be one of the best new books I read in 2013 because Saunders is, indeed, something special,” she reported last week.
And piling on the praise, New York Times reviewer Michiko Kakutani wrote that “December” has much in common with Sherwood Anderson's classic “Winesburg, Ohio.”
Once a cult darling, Saunders, 54, has managed to break into the mainstream, with “December” entering USA Today's Best-Selling Books list last week at No. 26, impressive for a collection of quirky stories from an author millions still do not know.
Saunders is definitely an acquired taste. Some critics have even used the word “weird” to describe his distinctive stories and style. They also have used innovative, brilliant, profound, provocative, unsettling, insightful, satiric and darkly hilarious. Add manic to describe this newest collection of 10 tales.
He continues to be a master of his craft, offering up the common man in all his hopes and despair. The veteran returning from war; a cancer patient contemplating suicide until ...; an everyday father of three writing a rambling diary about his need to keep up with the Joneses, then buying lawn ornaments which happen to be live girls strung on wires. See?
But has Saunders written the best book you'll read this year?
Hard to say. It's only January. More good literature will most likely appear before 2014 dawns. Come back in December. We'll chat.
Craig Wilson is a staff writer for USA Today.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.