ShareThis Page

Lives in 'Carrion Birds' as barren as Western landscape

| Saturday, June 22, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

A criminal who vows to go straight after that one last job is a tried and true idea, but Urban Waite makes the idea seem fresh as he adds the disintegrating of a family to his plot.

Akin to the brutal yet solid storytelling of the movie “The Wild Bunch” and Jim Thompson's “The Getaway,” Waite delves into Western noir as he looks at destructive moral dilemmas.

More than 12 years ago, Ray Lamar left his home of Coronado, N.M., after his wife was killed and his toddler son left brain damaged in a car crash. Her death was retaliation against Ray by a drug cartel. All these years, Ray hasn't seen his son, whom he left in the care of his aged father, nor his cousin, Tom, with whom he was raised like twins. In a misguided attempt to help Ray, Tom went after a suspected drug dealer; an incident that eventually cost Tom his job as the local sheriff and has “forever defined his life.”

Ray plans to do one last job for a crime boss. But Ray has barely begun before everything goes horribly wrong. Both cousins want the kind of life that they can never have because it was torn apart by violence. Added to the mix is Edna Kelly, the current sheriff who is loyal to Tom, her former boss, but also to enforcing the law. Her professionalism and compassion add texture to the tale.

Set in a dying town where dried up oil wells and abandoned homes dot the landscape, “The Carrion Birds” uses the barren area as a metaphor for the characters' lives. Waite makes the reader feel the arid desert while making an unlikable character such as Ray sympathetic. “The Carrion Birds” moves briskly, with an unflinching brutality.

Oline H. Cogdill is a staff writer for the Sun Sentinel (South Florida).

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.