Trafford spouses look at human condition through poetry, memoir
By Rege Behe
Published: Sunday, June 23, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
They have so much in common now — two children, a home in Trafford, a marriage — that it's hard to believe there once was a seemingly unbridgeable gulf between them. The woman said “no,” again and again, to the mere idea of sharing her life with another writer. The man put up a similar resistance to marriage itself because he thought a writer's life required an unstinting intensity and focus on work that would not lend itself to the institution.
But after 13 years of marriage, Lori Jakiela and Dave Newman are happy and thriving, proof that two writers can share an intimacy that transcends the written word.
“It had to be Newman,” Jakiela says. “I kept my life pretty compartmentalized. My writing life was separate from other aspects of my life. I sort of kept these things in little boxes, and I didn't think you could have all of those things happening in your life at the same time where you could be in a relationship, be in love with someone and share writing, too.”
Jakiela and Newman will hold a joint book release party on June 29 at the East End Book Exchange in Bloomfield. Jakiela's new book is a memoir, “The Bridge to Take When Things Get Serious” (C&R Books). Newman is publishing “The Slaughterhouse Poems” (White Gorilla Press), his first full-length book of poetry.
There are shared qualities in the couple's work. Both are writing about events decades old, distance being essential.
“The further you get away from people and relationships and environments, the more you can write about them truthfully,” Newman says. “We always joke that everybody writes ‘This Boy's Life' (the 1989 memoir by Tobias Wolff) about growing up. Everybody talks about their parents and growing up, but how do you talk about your spouse?”
“The closer it gets to your present life, it's harder and riskier,” Jakiela says. “It's easier for me to write about childhood.”
The goal of any writer is to illustrate or shine light upon the essential truths of the human condition. Jakiela and Newman ascribe to that theory, but a sentence or a paragraph or page from one of their books is not necessarily historically accurate.
Whether it's poetry, memoir or fiction, “they all offer their versions of the truth,” Newman says. “Sometimes poetry, because it's so small and the moments are so tiny, it seems like, in some ways, if you're writing narrative or concrete poetry, you're writing a really accurate representation of life. You don't need the arc that maybe a memoirist or novelist needs. You just have this little moment, and those really appear true in a lot of ways.”
Truth is essential for any memoirist — just ask James Frey. But the idea that what's presented in a memoir is a complete picture of a life isn't correct. Jakiela admits that putting so much of her life on the printed page is “crazy,” but there are elements that don't find their way into her work.
“You know the pieces that I've shown you, which isn't the whole thing,” Jakiela says. “The odd thing about the genre is people think they know everything (about you). They don't. They know these little Petri dish elements that add up to a narrative.”
“I'm always shocked when (poems) go into the world and people judge you on them,” Newman says. “They assume you are that person.”
Newman admits that supposition is natural, however inaccurate. But what he and Jakiela are most hoping for is a resonance, a connection that invites readers to share experiences.
“I don't know if (memoir) is something I consciously chose, to say ‘I'm going to write about myself because I find myself endlessly interesting,' because I don't,” Jakiela says. “But I find the human condition and stuff that happens to people endlessly interesting.”
Rege Behe is a contributing writer for Trib Total Media.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Latest 007 novel doesn’t quite stay with its mission
- Expert’s history of musicals shows him as fan, too
- ‘Bombshell’ keeps the twists coming