Lehrer's JFK novel 'Top Down' lacks impact
“What if?” is a tried-and-true starting point for a novelist. In the case of “Top Down,” PBS newsman and veteran fiction writer Jim Lehrer asks an intriguing question, but doesn't quite come up with an equally intriguing answer.
What if the Secret Service agent who decided not to equip the presidential limousine with its bubble top ended up blaming himself for John F. Kennedy's assassination? Lehrer comes to the question naturally because, on Nov. 22, 1963, he was a young Dallas newspaper reporter covering the president's visit. In fact, he asked about the Plexiglas covering as the security detail prepared for the day's events.
In Lehrer's 21st novel, Dallas newspaper reporter Jack Gilmore looks back at the events of that awful day from the standpoint of five years. It's 1968, and college student Marti Walters enlists Gilmore to help save her father from the depression that's killing him. He's been tortured by the belief that the Plexiglas covering he decided not to install would have deflected Lee Harvey Oswald's bullets.
Gilmore is moved less by the idea of saving agent Walters from himself — or by the possibility of romance with Marti — than the prospect of a sweet exclusive for the newspaper. He agrees to keep the whole episode off the record in order to participate, but can he keep such a promise?
It's a promising plot, especially as a cultural take on the event that rocked the country a half-century ago. Yet, Lehrer is slow to get it off the ground — recording the Walters family's reaction to the assassination is not at all compelling — and the payoff is thin. A bigger point about America then and now, how we deal with honor, or even the “what if's” in our own lives is too understated if not absent.
Two years ago, Stephen King turned his own “what if” on the Kennedy assassination into a doorstop of a best-seller, “1 1⁄22/63.” Under 200 pages, Lehrer's novel is a quarter the size of King's — and far lighter in all the ways that count.
Douglass K. Daniel, author of “Tough as Nails: The Life and Films of Richard Brooks,” is a contributing writer for the Associated Press
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.