Player's Advantage: 'Progression' betting strategy won't increase profits
Before I leave for a casino vacation, a buddy usually slips me $20 for a special blackjack bet. His instructions are specific:
• Bet it all on one hand.
• If that wins, bet the original $20 and the winnings on a second hand.
• If the second hand wins, bet everything on a third hand.
• If that wins, cash out and bring home the money.
If he wins three hands in a row, as he has once or twice, he'll enjoy a profit of at least $140 (minus a tip for sterling play, of course). If he doesn't, as he did during my trip last month to Tunica County, Miss., he's out $20, which he considers a reasonable cost for the potential payout on a bet made only a couple of times a year.
Maybe he should have invested this summer's bet with another friend, who relayed a fun story about a recent visit to a casino restaurant. On his way to the car, he remembered having a $20 gift card in his wallet. He says he cashed it in, played at a $5 blackjack table for about five minutes without losing and walked away with $50 cash.
Most blackjack players know the thrill of a winning streak, when all the cards come out right — at least for them — and the chips stack up. Naturals come like clockwork, double-downs always hit and the dealer busts on cue.
One reason those streaks are so enjoyable is that they don't happen often. After all, players lose more hands than they win.
According to wizardof odds.com, an encyclopedia of gambling strategy and statistics, a blackjack player who follows basic strategy wins 42.4 percent of hands, loses 49.1 percent and ties the rest. With ties excluded, the player wins 46.36 percent of hands.
Although the dealer wins more than half the time, players get paid 3-to-2 for blackjacks and get extra on double-downs. That helps make up for losing more often.
The probability of a player winning three hands in a row is about one in 10, according to the Wizard's calculations. The probability of winning six in a row is about one in 100.
Many players raise their bets after a winning hand, hoping they are at the beginning of a one-in-a-hundred or even one-in-a-thousand longshot. While that approach is fun when it works, it usually doesn't.
No betting system can overcome the house edge. Not counting ties, over time, a basic-strategy player will win about 46 and lose about 54 of every 100 hands played, regardless of the size of the bet.
Raising your bet after each win — called “positive progression” betting — will result in occasional sessions with monster profits, but it won't improve your results overall. By definition, progression bettors are virtually guaranteed to lose their biggest wager. Often, a progression bettor finds himself with an unusually large bet and a hand that calls for putting out even more to double-down or split. Some will make an incorrect play because of the fear of putting even more money at risk; some will make the correct play and see all their profits vanish in the flash of the wrong card.
Blackjack experts say progression betting will not affect the long-term outcome for a basic-strategy player, but the swings for a progression bettor will be wilder than for a player who bets roughly the same amount all the time. In the long run, the house will win about 0.5 percent of the money a basic-strategy player bets. The more you bet overall, the more the house wins.
The best time to raise your bet is when you have a better-than-usual chance of winning the next hand. That's determined not by whether you just won but by the cards remaining to be dealt. When the rest of the deck is rich in faces and Aces — which you can know only by tracking the cards as they come out — your chances of winning increase. That's when you should raise your bet.
Mark Gruetze is administrative editor for Trib Total Media and a longtime recreational gambler who has been known to raise his bets after winning. He can be reached at 412-320-7838 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.