ShareThis Page

Let's all #WriteAHappyStoryIn4Words

Mary Pickels
| Wednesday, Dec. 6, 2017, 1:24 p.m.
The Natural Park Service posted this photo to #WriteAHappyStoryIn4Words,' with the caption 'Nature's good for you.'
@NatureNPS
The Natural Park Service posted this photo to #WriteAHappyStoryIn4Words,' with the caption 'Nature's good for you.'

The Twitterverse is lighting up with the challenge to post a photo, video or gif accompanied by a few single words - four, to be exact - to create a happy story.

#WriteAHappyStoryIn4Words is leading to the praising of food, music, holidays, love, pets - along with many political statements and opinions - with images (hopefully) strong enough that few words are needed.

A stack of books - and the precious time to read them - makes this poster happy.

Actor Nick Offerman demonstrates the joy derived from the fantasy of "Eating Without Getting Fat" in this gif.

@NOAASatellites shows us the beauty of our planet with "This Is Our Home."

Students from grade school through grad school will be dancing along with "Finally Finished With Finals."

Heartstrings get a tug with "Rescued Bears Enjoying Life."

And "Baby Shoes, Well Worn."

And "Saved From the Street."

News of a long-awaited forever home is conveyed in "Just watch this video."

A bad habit gets kicked.

And hopes are expressed for that happy ending so many of us pine for.

Mary Pickels is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 724-836-5401 or mpickels@tribweb.com or via Twitter @MaryPickels.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.