ShareThis Page

'Killing Lincoln' docu-drama takes to the streets of Richmond

| Friday, Feb. 15, 2013, 8:37 p.m.
Jesse Johnson portrays John Wilkes Booth in the television film Killing Lincoln based on the best-selling book by Bill O'Reilly.??photo credit:  National Geographic Channels
National Geographic Channels
Jesse Johnson portrays John Wilkes Booth in the television film Killing Lincoln based on the best-selling book by Bill O'Reilly.??photo credit: National Geographic Channels

On a sultry summer day in Richmond, Va. — the Confederate capital during the Civil War — a film crew has gathered at a historic building refitted to look like a telegraph office. The scene being shot features Abraham Lincoln (Billy Campbell) receiving a message and then discussing it with Secretary of War Edwin Stanton (Graham Beckel).

Despite the sweltering heat, the bearded men wear waistcoats and jackets, and the women are decked out in period dresses, with corsets. The only person who seems comfortable is local actor Benjamin Perkinson, with his little suit and slicked-back hair, as Lincoln's young son, Tad.

In production is “Killing Lincoln,” set to air Sunday on National Geographic Channel, a two-hour mix of drama and documentary based on the best-selling “historical thriller” of the same name by Fox News Channel anchor Bill O'Reilly (“The O'Reilly Factor”) and historian-researcher Martin Dugard. Tom Hanks narrates.

Executive producers for the project are brothers Ridley and Tony Scott (the latter who tragically committed suicide in August 2012) for Scott Free Productions, in partnership with National Geographic Channel.

The other scene being shot in the small building — crammed with cameras, crew and cast — is between Lincoln assassin John Wilkes Booth (Jesse Johnson, son of actor Don Johnson) and his sister, Asia (Sara Eshleman). It features Booth singing a song whose lyrics were uncovered during research for the movie.

It's a sad scene, in which Asia realizes that her brother's fanaticism will ultimately be his undoing.

A bit later on, when the crew breaks for lunch, Beckel — who has just arrived that day and isn't entirely sure what channel this movie will air on — gets to meet Johnson for the first time. He's flabbergasted by his resemblance to the real Booth.

Blue-eyed Johnson — who grew a mustache and has his blond hair dyed dark for the role — pulls up a photograph on his phone to show Beckel the inspiration for his look.

“Man, you're perfect,” Beckel says to Johnson. “Which one's you? You're perfect. You've got the swagger.”

Beckel is the brother of one of O'Reilly's fellow Fox News Channel commentators, liberal Bob Beckel (“The Five”). But the Beckel brothers have a personal connection to the Lincoln assassination story.

Beckel explains, “My great-grandfather was in Ford's Theatre the night that Lincoln got killed. I'm very close to this story.”

He's also done some reading about the theory that Stanton was, if not complicit in the assassination, not exactly ignorant of it.

“Booth put a bullet in Lincoln's head,” Beckel says. “But it was something that Stanton damn well knew about. But he didn't want him to go to the theater. He was ambivalent about it.

“His fingerprints are all over it, only because he knew ... but he didn't know Booth. Stanton had spies all over the country. He was aware of it, and he knew what the motives were.”

As an actor playing an assassin who was an actor, Johnson did his research and says, “What I discovered was a man who was completely contradictory to my high-school history books, in terms of character. He's this very complex, passionate and magnanimous, magnetic character that was so often depicted as this demonic, mustache-twirling villain — and understandably so.

“President Lincoln was martyred, and Booth was vilified. That was the black-and-white story that could be told, that could sell newspapers and then make its way into the ink of our history books forever.”

Kate O'Hare is a writer for Zap2it.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.