Share This Page

Russell and Rhys play Russian spies in the 'burbs

| Wednesday, Feb. 13, 2013, 8:39 p.m.

It all started with a slap for Matthew Rhys. Trying out for “The Americans,” he took one in the puss from Keri Russell.

This new FX dramafocuses on two KGB spies posing as an ordinary American couple shortly after Ronald Reagan became president.

As Philip and Elizabeth Jennings, they have a comfortable home in a Washington suburb, two sweet kids, a travel agency they run and, by all signs, a solid piece of the American Dream. No one would suspect that they are Russian-born plants bent on burying the United States with subterfuge and brutality.

No one, that is, unless it's their new neighbor, FBI agent Stan Beeman (played by Noah Emmerich with an infectious mix of cunning and dorkiness), who has recently moved in with his family across the street. He represents just one among the many threats of exposure, imprisonment or death they face daily.

“It's an incredible balancing act to portray: the domesticity of their suburban lives and the struggle of their relationship as an arranged couple, and then the extreme spy stuff,” Rhys says.

“The balancing act is very difficult,” echoes Russell in a separate interview. “We're spies, but how much do you play that reality? And how do you play the masquerade that you're not a spy? There are so many layers to it.”

“The Americans” is a good old-fashioned thriller, set in a pre-cellphone, -Internet and -PC world where gumption counts as much as gadgetry in the espionage game, and where the world is an anxious place, yet, handily divided between Good and the Evil Empire (as Reagan dubbed the Soviet Union).

Meanwhile, the series calls on viewers to root for Philip and Elizabeth as they risk everything to advance this “Evil Empire.”

But, however driven in their partnership, they are butting heads. Elizabeth despises American values. She is fiercely devoted to the cause of Mother Russia. But Philip is torn: He doesn't think the U.S. is such a bad place.

“That kind of disagreement is something I understand as someone who is not a spy, but as just someone in a marriage,” says Russell with a knowing smile.

For most viewers, Russell, now 36, needs no introduction. In 1998 she burst on the scene, complete with those flowing pre-Raphaelite curls, in the title role of “Felicity,” then followed up with the miniseries “Into the West,” films including “Extraordinary Measures,” “Waitress” and her upcoming horror flick, “Dark Skies,” and, alongside Will Arnett, the short-lived sitcom “Running Wilde.”

The script for “The Americans” arrived at Russell's door just days after the December 2011 birth of her second child, Willa Lou, with carpenter-husband Shane Deary. Understandably, she wasn't eager to rush back to work.

“But this show was so strange and complicated I couldn't really figure it out, and I thought, ‘That could stay interesting and fun to do,'” she says. Besides, it conveniently substitutes circa-1980s Washington with New York locations. “It shoots near my house in Brooklyn. I can ride my bike to work.”

Still sylphic and long-haired, Russell makes an ideal Elizabeth Jennings, who, by turns, is a lovely wife and mother, a fearless operative and a rock-'em-sock-'em brawler.

To hear her talk, Russell seems thrilled with her leading man.

The 38-year-old Welsh-born Rhys is best known from ABC's drama “Brothers & Sisters,” where he played lawyer and gay man Kevin Walker. His credits also include the indie film “The Scapegoat” and the BBC miniseries “The Mystery of Edwin Drood.”

“He's a real actor, I'm in awe of him,” Russell says. “We'll be doing a scene and I'll go, ‘Matthew's doing all of that, and I'm just doing this! Arggggg!' Between Matthew and Noah Emmerich and me, I'm the most boring TV person in the show.”

When those words are shared with Rhys, he bursts out laughing.

“She's incredible! She's the total package,” he says. “Her work ethic is huge, she takes the right things seriously and most of the other stuff, not. I wish she had a little more awareness of how good she is.”

Rhys was asked to test opposite Russell based on his impressive off-Broadway debut in the 2011 revival of the modern classic “Look Back in Anger.”

“I was brought in for the infamous ‘chemistry read,'” he says, meant to see how he and Russell would mesh.

He was one of several prospects.

“In between them, I was pumping in the bathroom because I was nursing a new baby,” Russell says, laughing. “And then I'd come out and test with the next stranger. We were reading the scene in the laundry room from the first episode, where Philip presents the idea of defection.” (Philip tells Elizabeth: “We could get relocated, live the good life, and be happy.”) “My character is outraged that he would even consider it.

“Basically, there's a slap in that scene,” Russell adds. “But when the first guy came in, I didn't do it.”

Then it was Rhys' turn. “The director said, ‘Slap him.' So I went for it.”

Rhys picks up the story: “Strange as it may sound, she slaps incredibly well. In the same place every time, and never near your eye. The swing of her arm was incredibly violent, but her wrist remained soft, so there wasn't much force behind it.”

Clearly, he and Russell connected.

“And now, it's become this ongoing joke,” he says. “Keri will slap me — not hard — just before a take, just to see how I react. I feel like Inspector Clouseau and she's Cato. It's a surreal feeling to have the demure, angelic Keri Russell wallop you across the chops at any moment. But it's great.”

Frazier Moore is a national television columnist for the Associated Press.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.