Leonardo da Vinci gets 'Batman' treatment in Starz series
In these 500 years since Leonardo da Vinci, he has upstaged every genius multitasker in his wake. (OK, not you, Benjamin Franklin and James Franco.)
Da Vinci was a whiz as a painter (hint: “Mona Lisa” and “The Last Supper”), a scientist, engineer and a futurist dead-set on fighting the gravitational pull of his time. He was an intellect, free-thinker, vegetarian and a humanist who supported himself designing weapons of war.
He was tall, handsome and a hit with the ladies. He was great with a sword and, being ambidextrous, which hand didn't matter.
“The phrase ‘Renaissance Man' was derived from him,” says David S. Goyer, who has spent a lot of time studying and pondering him and has created “Da Vinci's Demons,” a sci-fi thriller set in the 1400s.
Another cool thing about da Vinci: He was a man of intrigue, ensconced in secret societies, his paternity unresolved (he was born out of wedlock), perhaps divinely inspired as he clashed with the Roman Catholic Church — a man who seemed to defy the confinements of any simple narrative.
“There's a tantalizing five-year gap, stretching from when he was 27 to 32, where there's almost no record of where he was or what he was doing,” Goyer says. “A gap like that is gold when you're the creator of this show.”
“Da Vinci's Demons,” which premieres on the Starz network on April 12, is a “historical fantasy,” says Goyer, who should be up to the challenge.
His credits include the ambitious sci-fi thriller “FlashForward,” which fell prey to meddling by its network, ABC. He was script consultant and story developer for the video game “Call of Duty: Black Ops” and its sequel. He co-wrote the 2005 film “Batman Begins” and its two sequels and wrote the screenplay for the upcoming Zack Snyder-directed “Man of Steel.”
In Goyer's view, da Vinci was the prototype of a superhero: “I picture him as one-third Indiana Jones, one-third Sherlock Holmes, one-third Tony Stark (Iron Man) — and he kind of was.”
To play this extraordinary chap, Goyer chose English-born actor Tom Riley. The 31-year-old starred in the British TV medical drama “Monroe” and in 2011 performed on Broadway in the revival of Tom Stoppard's “Arcadia” alongside Billy Crudup and Raul Esparza.
Riley's da Vinci is sexy, mercurial and irrepressible. He savors life in his native Florence: “Chaos and culture are celebrated within these walls,” he says. “Florence only demands one thing of its people — to be truly awake!”
But da Vinci suffers from being too awake. He is too driven, too full of ideas, too haunted by doubts about his life's intended mission. He is no stranger to opium, which he uses, he explains, because “I think too much. I need to dull my thoughts or I will be eviscerated by them.”
At times, he overreaches, stumbles and falls. And he has an eye for a pretty face, including Lucrezia Donati (Laura Haddock), the mistress of Lorenzo di Medici (Elliot Cowan), da Vinci's benefactor and one of the city's most powerful figures.
Goyer says he hit upon doing a show about da Vinci only by chance. He had never done anything historical before, and when asked by Starz to create a drama focused on some towering figure from the past, he first demurred.
“I said, ‘I'm not — no offense — interested in doing a kind of dry, BBC historical drama.' And they said, ‘No, no, no. We don't want that!' ”
A number of possible candidates were considered for what was now envisioned as a “reinvention-of-history show.” There was Cleopatra and Genghis Khan, “and also on that short list, da Vinci came up,” recalls Goyer. “Then I realized, no one's ever done a show about da Vinci! That's crazy! People say he's the most recognized figure in history other than Jesus Christ!”
Frazier Moore is a national television columnist for the Associated Press.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Steelers QB Roethlisberger not targeting Oct. 25 return
- Rossi: Time for Pirates to take next step
- Steelers notebook: Tomlin not worried about Jones’ lack of sacks
- Penguins rally in wake of Dupuis injury
- New Florence assistant fire chief charged with having sex with juvenile
- Wolf still seeking to raise income tax, impose tax on shale-gas drilling
- Fleury’s demeanor helps keep Penguins loose, him playing his best
- How the Pirates put together another postseason contender
- Fans connect with their beloved Pirates through homemade signs
- Same cast, improved results for Pitt defense
- Cubs’ Arrieta, Pirates’ Cole leave batters with little margin for error