Hannibal Lecter dishes up liver, suspense in new TV series
Liver and loin are served up gourmet-style, young women are impaled on antlers, mushrooms grow out of decomposing bodies.
Hannibal Lecter, one of the world's creepiest fictional villains, is back, and this time he is not locked up but is a respected psychiatrist with an appetite for art, fine clothes, good food and red wine.
And he is hiding a very dark secret.
“Hannibal,” which debuts on NBC on April 4, is the first U.S. television series about the infamous cannibal created by Thomas Harris in his 1981 book “Red Dragon” and made famous by actor Anthony Hopkins in his Oscar-winning turn in “Silence of the Lambs.”
After five Hannibal Lecter movies and four novels, the new TV series is based on just five early pages of “Red Dragon” and serves as a prequel to the entire Hannibal Lecter book and movie legend.
It combines solving a weekly, gory crime with the back story of Lecter and his early FBI nemesis, Will Graham.
“As somebody who had read the books and was really a student of Thomas Harris, I felt there were definitely aspects of the literature that had not been explored,” creator and executive producer Bryan Fuller says.
“There was a great chapter of Hannibal Lecter's life that we haven't seen in any of the movies or any of the books. We have seen him incarcerated and as a young man, and I felt the most interesting part of his life was when he was a practicing psychiatrist and a practicing cannibal and who he was prior to incarceration,” Fuller adds.
Danish actor Mads Mikkelsen, best-known for playing the villain in 2006 James Bond film “Casino Royale,” takes on the role of Lecter, bringing a sophisticated, alluring edge to the psychopathic killer.
“I didn't feel beholden to how he was seen in the films ... I knew this Lecter had to be sexy, had to have a sensuality to him, because he is a man who appreciates beauty,” Fuller says.
But it was the character of Graham, played by Hugh Dancy, the hyper-sensitive criminal profiler who knows how serial killers tick, that first intrigued Fuller.
“Will Graham has always been seen as a stoic, competent investigator. What was appealing to me is that he is actually very vulnerable as a human being because he has to imagine himself as these killers.
“I thought it was an opportunity to really see the effects on the human psyche of being exposed to terrible violence,” Fuller explains.
The first episode of “Hannibal” is inspired by two brief scenes in “Red Dragon” in which Graham recalls his emotional breakdown over his investigation and fatal shooting of a serial killer called the Minnesota Shrike.
The entire first season of the TV show — and the subsequent four planned seasons — takes place before the plot of “Red Dragon” takes off, and years before “Silence of the Lambs.” It focuses on Graham's mental anguish and his growing friendship and trust in Lecter, to whom he turns for emotional and psychological support.
Being a Hannibal story, however, the TV show serves up lashings of spurting blood, graphic violence and delicious-looking meals of dubious provenance featuring liver, lungs and loin.
Fuller says the violence is both a reflection of the horror genre and the source material, as well as a means of underscoring why Graham loses his grip on sanity by being constantly exposed to such dark crimes.
“I thought we should have a certain amount of graphic depiction because it honors the genre. I also wanted to be respectful of the audience that is tuning in for the Hannibal Lecter show, and that comes with certain expectations and requirements,” Fuller says.
Jill Serjeant writes for Reuters.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- West Virginia county hears arguments on proposed smoking ban
- City, Jordan Miles continue fight over legal costs
- Steelers are in familiar territory going into training camp in Latrobe
- MSA Safety posts drop in profit
- Scientists: Earth in midst of 6th ‘mass extinction’
- Truck crashes into Dairy Queen, five injured in Penn Hills
- Rossi: Johnston must reach Malkin in Moscow
- White House, senators close on bill to end NSA spying
- Poverty programs would be merged
- Fishing report: Pymatuning walleye fishing remains tough
- Beaver DA believes girls might have lived had dad responded faster