Pop culture Q&A: 'Unforgettable' to return for third season in summer 2014
By Rich Heldenfels
Published: Sunday, Oct. 20, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Question: I understand “Unforgettable” with Poppy Montgomery is a summer-only show. I have really enjoyed it and wonder if there's a chance we'll see more. I didn't even realize there was a first season. I loved Poppy in “Without a Trace,” and it's good to have her back.
Answer: CBS has ordered a third, 13-episode season of the drama for telecast in summer 2014. In addition, there are half a dozen episodes still unaired from the second season that the network will show at some point.
Q: Will “Mistresses” be returning?
A: Yes. ABC plans to give it another summer run in 2014. Summer series are becoming increasingly useful tools for the networks trying to keep audiences around during a period that used to be filled with reruns, or more recently with a mix of reruns and reality TV.
Summer reruns were for a long time beneficial to networks because they filled air time without networks paying for new shows. But as cable and online have offered more and more original programming during the summer, the reruns did not draw as well, So we now get more scripted series in summer, And several from 2013 — including “Mistresses,” the previously mentioned “Unforgettable” and the big hit “Under the Dome” — were renewed after their summer success.
Q: I am surprised that neither “Hoarders” on A&E or “Hoarding: Buried Alive” on TLC seem to be returning. Weren't these much-watched series? They certainly are still talked about a lot.
A: You are half right. “Hoarding: Buried Alive” will be back in spring 2014. “Hoarders” has ended its run on A&E. It did have six seasons, as well as DVD releases of episodes, I often found its stories of compulsive savers and the horrors of their homes to be fascinating to the point that I could not turn away from a marathon of telecasts. At the same time, there came a point where the tales were sadly redundant, and where A&E likely saw better ways to fill its TV time.
Q: Why are there cameras filming the folks on “The Office”?
A: In a conceit carried over from the original British version of the series, a documentary crew is chronicling the events at the company, although that proved to be a very long chronicle. In the final season of the series, the documentary makers tell Jim and Pam that they have stayed around for nine years to see how the people turn out. Near the end of the series, the documentary — titled “The Office: An American Workplace” — is finally finished and airs on PBS. In the series finale, most of the Dunder Mifflin staff gathers at the Scranton Cultural Center for a screening and panel discussion about the documentary.
Q: Why did the producers of “Everybody Loves Raymond” change the names of the twins from Gregory and Matthew to Jeffrey and Michael?
A: The names used in the pilot of the series are also the names of star Ray Romano's two sons (and he has a daughter, Ally, as does the television Raymond). In a DVD commentary on the show's pilot episode, Romano said he later felt weird about the names and so changed the boys'. (Ally remained.) In the commentary, Romano also says that the parallels between his TV life and his real life were sometimes uncomfortable — that the portrayal of his TV brother, for one thing, did not sit well with his real brother. So, he might have wanted to create more separation between the two lives.
Rich Heldenfels is a staff writer for the Akron Beacon Journal. Write him at Akron Beacon Journal, 44 E. Exchange St., Akron, OH 44328 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Steelers safety Polamalu finds himself in tough position
- Kovacevic: A great day to appreciate No. 68
- LeBeau wants to come back as Steelers defensive coordinator
- Firefighters battle house fire in Bloomfield
- Pitt’s Donald sweeps Outland, Bednarik awards, named All-American
- Power play, penalty kill help put Penguins on another 100-point pace
- Penguins notebook: Popularity with female fans brings test event to Consol
- Discovery of mummified body in Bellevue under investigation
- Man wounded in Mt. Lebanon apartment shooting
- Pirates claim 3 pitchers in minor league Rule 5 draft
- Steelers notebook: Cutting down turnovers, sacks hasn’t led to victories