ShareThis Page

Kevin Spacey replaced in Ridley Scott film one month before its release

| Thursday, Nov. 9, 2017, 9:09 a.m.
Kevin Spacey (left) is getting cut out of Ridley Scott’s finished film “All the Money in the World” and replaced by Christopher Plummer just over one month before it’s supposed to hit theaters.
Kevin Spacey (left) is getting cut out of Ridley Scott’s finished film “All the Money in the World” and replaced by Christopher Plummer just over one month before it’s supposed to hit theaters.

Even for those who think they have seen it all in Hollywood, 2017 continues to be a year of surprises. In the latest twist to the unfolding downfall of actor Kevin Spacey, his role as tycoon J. Paul Getty in “All the Money in the World” is being recast with Christopher Plummer.

Director Ridley Scott is said to be aiming to shoot and edit the scenes with Plummer in time to still make the film's scheduled release date of Dec. 22. The film was initially planned to have its world premiere next week as the closing night of AFI Fest. The movie was pulled from that slot earlier this week.

“All the Money in the World” tells the saga of the 1973 kidnapping of Getty's grandson John Paul Getty III and the behind-the-scenes efforts for his return. The movie also stars Michelle Williams, Mark Wahlberg and Charlie Plummer (no relation).

A representative of Sony confirmed the reshoot news to the Los Angeles Times and that Wahlberg and Williams are expected to participate.

The decision was said to be made by Scott, his Scott Free Productions and Imperative Entertainment, the film's producers. Sony, which will release the film in the U.S. through TriStar Pictures, supports the decision.

While an awards campaign had initially been planned for Spacey, and subsequently scrapped as he became engulfed in scandal, it was not immediately clear if a similar push would be put forward for Plummer's yet-to-be-shot performance.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.