ShareThis Page

New 'West Wing' with Sterling K. Brown? We're in ... but what about 'This is Us'?

| Friday, Dec. 1, 2017, 10:24 a.m.
Actor Sterling K. Brown, a cast member in the NBC series 'This Is Us,' poses for a portrait during the 2017 Television Critics Association Summer Press Tour at the Beverly Hilton on Thursday, Aug. 3, 2017, in Beverly Hills, Calif. (Photo by Chris Pizzello/Invision/AP)
Chris Pizzello/Invision/AP
Actor Sterling K. Brown, a cast member in the NBC series 'This Is Us,' poses for a portrait during the 2017 Television Critics Association Summer Press Tour at the Beverly Hilton on Thursday, Aug. 3, 2017, in Beverly Hills, Calif. (Photo by Chris Pizzello/Invision/AP)

A new version of "The West Wing"? Wow, that could be great.

Sterling K. Brown as president? Casting genius.

Brown leaving "This is Us"? Now, hold on a minute.

Aaron Sorkin teased the idea of an updated "West Wing" in an interview with the Hollywood Reporter . He said he has a standing offer from NBC to reboot the series, which ran from 1999 to 2006.

Sorkin's preferred scenario, he said in the interview, would involve, "Sterling K. Brown as the president, and there's some kind of jam, an emergency, a very delicate situation involving the threat of war or something, and (President) Bartlet (played by Martin Sheen), long since retired, is consulted in the way that Bill Clinton used to consult with Nixon."

Brown seemed all for the idea:

But his boss on "This is Us," Ken Olin, isn't quite ready to let go of the actor who plays one of three siblings on the hit tearjerker.

Sorkin, who is promoting his film directorial debut "Molly's Game," says his stumbling block — other than Brown's commitment to that other NBC show — is how to bring Allison Janney's C.J. Cregg or Bradley Whitford's Josh Lyman into the new scenario.

So, don't expect a "West Wing" reboot anytime soon.

Until then, you'll have to settle for this clip:

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.