ShareThis Page
Movies/TV

Review: No reservations needed when checking out 'Hotel Artemis'

| Thursday, June 7, 2018, 11:30 a.m.

“Hotel Artemis” is a shining example of how it is not the amount of money spent to make a movie, but how the budget is being spent.

Director/writer Drew Pearce has managed to take the money that would be the cape-pressing budget for most superhero movies and create a high-energy, gritty-looking and prophetically scary tale set in the near future that comes across as big as any summer blockbuster but offers far more bang for the bucks in the writing, visuals and acting.

The film looks at “a typical Wednesday night” in the year 2028. The streets of downtown Los Angeles are the location for the most violent riot in the city's history. All the blue war-painted protestors want is clean water, something that has become a premium in the state because of corporate greed.

Four men wearing skull masks find themselves in the middle of a failed bank heist where one of the robbers gets wounded.

Sherman Atkins (Sterling K. Brown) must get his brother, Lev Atkins (Brian Tyree), to the only place criminals can get medical attention, Hotel Artemis, without attracting the attention of the law. The medical care is given by the no-nonsense woman known only as The Nurse (Jodie Foster).

Visually compelling film

The film is as compelling visually as either “Blade Runner” movie, from Pearce's depiction of the riot-filled streets of Los Angeles to the guest rooms for the patients that reflect a passion for the exotic that has faded.

Pearce has created a very believable world that looks to be on the doorstep of being post-apocalyptic. The way the director keeps the action confined to a minimal number of sets (partly because of budget restrictions) works because it creates a playlike structure with more of an emphasis on the actors than on the action.

And, “Hotel Artemis” is filled with standout performances topped by an Oscar-worthy effort by Foster, who in recent years has been more content to work behind the cameras instead of in front of them.

Foster transforms herself, from her world-weary face to a way of shuffling when she walks that suggests a life of pain and suffering ignored to spend more time helping others. This is one of the Oscar-winner's best and most memorable performances.

That's because Pearce was so willing to cast against type with her and Brown. His performance as the always-planning thief couldn't be any more different from his work on “This Is Us.” It's a chance for Brown to show his range and in the process create a character who is smart, loyal and just a little dangerous.

Unusual casting

The unusual casting continues through Dave Bautista, Charlie Day, Jenny Slate and Zachary Quinto.

“Hotel Artemis” gives Bautista a chance to show he can do more than flex his muscles, while Day plays the most despicable character of his career. One of the biggest surprises is Slate, who is often cast in lighter projects, but this dramatic role pays off.

Every bit of casting works. Pearce is able to bridge the worlds of great acting and superb action through Sofia Boutella, who plays Nice, an assassin for hire. Generally, Boutella plays the role with a scary likability that is at its best in scenes with Brown. She is also involved in one of the best confined space fight sequences in film since “Captain America: Winter Soldier.”

Getting both a very human and very deadly performance from Boutella is another example of how Pearce has shown great prudence in making the movie. Everything about the movie works, whether it is viewed as just another summer popcorn movie or as a small independent film driven by a compelling story and performances.

The film was made on a low budget, but it wasn't cheaply made. Don't have any reservations about checking out “Hotel Artemis.”

Rick Bentley is a Tribune News Service writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me