These weary 'Stand Up Guys' need to sit down and rest
Not every senior citizen passes his or her autumn years in dignity, surrounded by family, respected by the few peers they still have left in this world.
And if the retirees in question are grizzled mobsters, old “made men” who haven't been in “our thing” for years and years, the last thing they'd ever expect to be is dignified.
One might live in denial, straining to act out versions of their younger selves in defiance of the passage of time. Another might have, for all intents and purposes, “checked out” before he checks out.
And one might wear the weight of their years and the guilt of their deeds, hanging on almost out of remorse.
“Stand Up Guys” is about three aged stand-up guys, a “crew” that hasn't been a crew in almost 30 years. It has three comically charismatic Oscar winners in the lead roles - Al Pacino, Christopher Walken and Alan Arkin - and a plot with room for comedy in it.
But the funereal tone is better suited to a picture with more gravitas than this Fisher Stevens film earns.
Pacino is Val, a mop-topped convict who gets out of a long stint in prison as the film opens.
Walken is Doc, his pal, loyal since the ‘70s, when Val went in. Doc is every inch the old man - a veritable recluse, painting, living in a dank apartment, visiting the same diner for every predictable meal.
But Val wants to party like it's 1979. Find a bar, find a brothel. That's not working out? Find some of this “new stuff” they've got now, Viagra.
It's meant to be a night “like the old days.” But there's a mob boss who still has a grudge. One guy is supposed to kill the other.
Val and Doc get into a kerfuffle. They right a wrong, steal a car. They drag their old getaway driver (Alan Arkin) out of a nursing home - oxygen tank and all.
They reminisce. “Remember that time you threw that Greek out the hotel window?”
Walken brings a quiet dignity to Doc, a man of violence long reformed - “I'm retired. I'm serious.”
But Pacino's Val ignores the entreaties of one and all to not embarrass himself. He does.
Arkin sparks the picture to life, acting his age AND being funny at it. And the addition of Julianna Margulies as the child of one “Stand Up Guy” and of Lucy Punch as the madam at the cut-rate brothel enlivens a few scenes.
But the central premise is a half-hearted retread. And the gags come from a score of earlier films and sitcoms.
Which is pretty much where these “Stand Up Guys” are stuck.
Roger Moore is a film critic for McClatchy-Tribune News Service.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.