Halle Berry determined not to phone in latest role
A 911 operator may be one of the most underappreciated jobs out there. But maybe not after “The Call” opens.
Halle Berry plays Jordan Turner, a veteran worker at the so-called Hive call center in Los Angeles, who has to keep an even keel trying to save an abducted teenager (Abigail Breslin) locked in a trunk with a cellphone.
The Oscar winner (“Monster's Ball”) spoke with us about the thriller.
Question: How did you think the movie came out?
Answer: Much of the filming I wasn't there for. I was in the call center most of the time, so I missed what they were doing. I could only imagine, but, wow, I was even scared. It turned out better than I thought. It was shot in just 20 days. It was shot as fast as it plays.
Q: How did you get involved with this project?
A: They came to me about two years before filming, but I wasn't able to do it because I had other obligations. I kept thinking they were going to go with someone else. I didn't want them to. Luckily for me, they waited. Then they said, ‘What do you think of Morris Chestnut as your love (interest?' I said, ‘Yes, please!'
Q: What kind of prep work did you have to do?
A: You get a different perspective by doing research. I think we both did. That's part of our job ... to find the truth in it. You can't know what it's like to be a cop even though you've seen it in the movies. But nobody ever saw a 911 center. I thought they lived in the ground somewhere. It was interesting to see who they were and how they deal and how stressful it can be. I was a wreck (watching them). They would just be as cool as can be doing their thing. I thought, ‘I could never do this job.'
Q: So, you have a new respect for the profession now, right?
A: Yes. They are who you call first. They are integral in the process. I take my hat off to them.
Madeleine Marr is a staff writer for The Miami Herald.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Jim Caviezel to be honored by Jimmy Stewart Museum
- DVD reviews: ‘Get Hard,’ ‘The Gunman’ and ‘While We’re Young’
- Review: ‘The Overnight’ swings into nuanced humor territory
- Review: Lovely ‘A Little Chaos’ could have used a little more ... chaos
- Review: ‘Laurent’ barely cuts deep enough for real exam