REVIEW: 'Lore' is a dark coming-of-age saga
The natural world is humming and thrumming, the rivers coursing, the green grass rustling, the bright sun arcing over woods and fields. But the five siblings dragging themselves across those woods and fields in Cate Shortland's fierce and powerful “Lore”have been buffeted by forces of man, not nature: namely, war.
The Third Reich has fallen, and in Germany, a Nazi officer and his wife take their children into hiding, and then abandon them as Allied trucks and tanks roll in. Led by Lore (Saskia Rosendahl), a strong-minded teenager, the group — twin boys, a younger sister, an infant — must trek clear across their ruined country to their grandmother's house.
Seeking shelter in abandoned farms, begging for food, literally stumbling into bloody corpses — this is not how Lore and the Dressler kinder (children) were raised. And when a young man comes along and helps them, Lore doesn't know what to do: Thomas (Kai-Peter Malina) is a Jew. Her parents spoke of this race of people with contempt. And here they are, their fate in a Jew's hands.
Shortland, an Australian filmmaker, contrasts the beauty of the land and the horrors committed by its human inhabitants. “ Lore” is a dark coming-of-age saga — about the trauma of war, about legacy, about collective guilt.
Stephen Rea reviews movies for the Philadelphia Inquirer.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.