TribLIVE

| AandE

 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

'To the Wonder' more a beautiful blunder

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

‘To the Wonder'

1⁄2 (out of 4)

R

Harris Theater

Pittsburgher movie quiz for yunz

Is 'Birdman' star Michael Keaton the best actor with western Pennsylvania ties? Click here to play the Trib's tongue-in-cheek attempt to find out.

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

By Claudia Puig
Thursday, April 18, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
 

Never was a film so visually stunning and so intolerable as “To the Wonder.”

Director Terrence Malick presents great beauty, but that doesn't save this pretentious, incoherent mess from insufferable tedium. Straining to be poetic and profound, “Wonder” emerges protracted and vapid, like a parody of an art film.

Case in point: dialogue such as “What is this love that loves us,” uttered in a whispery French voice-over narration by Olga Kurylenko. She plays Marina, and she's musing about her romance with Neil (Ben Affleck).

Marina is a Ukrainian divorcée living in Paris with a 10-year-old daughter. Neil is an American who meets Marina while traveling in Europe.

Neil asks Marina and daughter Tatiana (Tatiana Chiline) to move with him to Oklahoma. Once there, he is morose for no discernible reason. But the free-spirited Marina makes the best of it by twirling and spinning and jumping on beds.

There's only so much anyone can take of someone endlessly romping and half-dancing through fields. By the same token, watching Affleck plod around wordlessly is hardly riveting. And, for some reason, his face is rarely on camera. Mostly, we see his back. His part could easily have been played by an extra.

This is Malick's follow-up to the brilliant “The Tree of Life” from 2011, which resonated as a dreamy meditation on memory and the origins of existence.

Despite its title, wonder is in short supply. Malick squanders cinematographer Emmanuel Lubezki's gorgeous visuals by not allowing them to be in service of a compelling story.

In an early scene, Marina and Neil, in the first blush of love, are mesmerized by the feel of their bare feet sinking into sticky wet sand. It's an apt metaphor for a film that slogs around without purpose, mired by its own fascination with itself.

Claudia Puig reviews movies for USA Today.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Movies

  1. Kennywood’s 4-D Theater adds senses of touch, smell to moviegoing experience
  2. Review: ‘Vacation’ is a funny homage to its predecessor
  3. Review: Dimwitted ‘Pixels’ falls apart before it begins
  4. Fuqua, Gyllenhaal trained side-by-side for Pittsburgh-shot ‘Southpaw’