No Audi R8s harmed in making of 'Iron Man 3'
“Iron Man 3” is nearing the $1 billion mark at the worldwide box office, but that doesn't mean it's any easier to see a perfectly good Audi R8 e-tron go crashing into the sea.
It's just part of billionaire Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.) losing everything in brilliant fashion.
His beautiful Malibu house goes kaboom because of an attack by the terrorist villain called The Mandarin. That includes Stark's prototype Audi R8 e-tron, seen charging inside the house at the time of the attack.
First, you see the car rattling around. Then, director Shane Black seemed intent on highlighting the R8 falling into the ocean with the mansion in the fiery scene. The car-maker, which has been a partner in each of the films, understood the need to show the car's demise.
Not to worry. As fate would have it, there are plenty more Audis for Stark to have, including an Audi A8 L which Stark takes from the baddie Savin (James Badge Dale) after dispatching him.
More on the bright side: The car that was destroyed in the original explosion was, like the destroyed house, a digital effect.
“I can honestly say no R8s were harmed in making the film,” says Sabouni.
Bryan Alexander is a staff writer for USA Today.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Review: ‘99 Homes’ is a terrific, scary look at real estate crisis
- Review: ‘Pan’ is weird and wacky, but it kinda works
- Review: ‘Big Stone Gap’ tells a southwest Virginia story with a light touch
- Review: Malala’s light shines through flawed documentary
- DVD reviews: ‘Me and Earl and the Dying Girl,’ ‘Magic Mike XXL’ and ‘Avengers: Age of Ultron’