'Fast & Furious 6' driven by little more than action and effects
One thing you can say about “Fast Furious 6”: It makes you appreciate the talents of Dwayne Johnson.
Sharing the screen next to the monosyllabic, gravel-voiced and expressionless Vin Diesel, Johnson's skills become even more evident. He's simultaneously charming, tough and funny, and makes this labored sequel almost watchable.
Note the “almost.” Johnson is essentially going it alone here. He gets no help from co-stars such as the charisma-impaired Paul Walker or Michelle Rodriguez, whose once-promising career seems to have been reduced to playing variations on the same tough-girl role.
The movie picks up with “The Fast and Furious” gang after their last outing. Toretto (Diesel) and his band of street-racing criminals have retired and are living off the riches from their last heist. However, they fall back into action when special agent Hobbs (Johnson) calls the crew to track down an evil mastermind (Luke Evans), who works with Letty (Rodriguez), whom everyone thought was dead after their last caper.
The plot, which bobs around between London, Spain and Los Angeles, is more complicated than it needs to be. It's obvious that the whole enterprise merely exists for the action sequences.
It's hard to get excited about any of the onscreen happenings, because director Justin Lin can't seem to hit the right notes. Other issues include comedic moments that thud and dramatic ones that will make you wince.
Perhaps the most annoying thing about the movie: The final scene sets up yet another sequel.
Randy Cordova is a movie critic for The Arizona Republic.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- DVD reviews: ‘Snowpiercer,’ ‘Life After Beth’ and ‘The Purge: Anarchy’
- Vin Diesel showing some love for Pittsburgh and co-star
- Review: ‘Best of Me’ is the worst of Nicholas Sparks
- Review: Gay rights, worker’s woes bring everyone together in ‘Pride’
- Review: ‘Fury’ makes a fine B-movie vehicle for Wardaddy Brad Pitt