American icons blaze a trail to theaters
It's American idol, big-screen edition.
Some of the nation's most enduring icons, from literature to sports, are suddenly filling the multiplex.
And ringing up profits. Consider the recent spate of hits from homegrown legends:
“The Great Gatsby”: The adaptation of F. Scott Fitzgerald's classic is the surprise hit of the year. The Leonardo DiCaprio drama stunned analysts with $142 million, the eighth-highest grossing film of 2013.
“42”: The story of Jackie Robinson breaking Major League Baseball's color barrier marked the highest debut on record for a baseball film at $28 million. The Harrison Ford movie stands at $95 million, making it the second-biggest baseball film, behind only 1992's “A League of Their Own” at $108 million.
“The Wizard of Oz” and “Superman: “Oz the Great and Powerful” muscled $235 million at the box office, while “Man of Steel” has soared to $249 million and counting, getting the franchise aloft for the first time in a quarter century.
The made-in-the-USA parade continues over this past weekend as Johnny Depp's “The Lone Ranger” gallops into theaters.
Once fodder for awards circles and art-house theaters, American legends are striking a sentimental chord among moviegoers.
“There's something about these characters that have appealed to every generation since they were invented,” says “Lone Ranger” producer Jerry Bruckheimer. Analysts expect the Western to do at least $130 million.
The trend continues through the year. Philip Seymour Hoffman and Edward Norton star in the documentary “Salinger.” The author biography hits screens Sept. 6. And James Thurber's short story “The Secret Life of Walter Mitty” arrives Christmas Day.
“They're America's original superheroes,” says Paul Dergarabedian, box office president of Hollywood.com. “And they're making money like superhero movies.”
Analysts credit America's 16th president with freeing American icons from the box-office doldrums. Last year, Steven Spielberg's biopic “Lincoln” racked up an astonishing $182 million. Audiences haven't been able to get enough since.
“It can't be long until we get the big-budget George Washington story,” says Jeff Bock, vice president of industry trackers Exhibitor Relations. “Suddenly, this is a genre audiences are willing to pay for.”
Bock credits the surge more to storytelling than nostalgia. “We wouldn't be talking about these movies if they weren't good,” he says.
Studios, always on the prowl for known properties, see the built-in brand recognition from American icons. “The movies have essentially played like sequels,” Dergarabedian says. “Except history is the prequel.”
Scott Bowles is a staff writer for USA Today.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.