ShareThis Page

Eco-vigilantes get down to nitty-gritty in 'The East'

| Thursday, July 11, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
(From left) Brit Marling, Patricia Clarkson,  Ellen Page and Alexander Skarsgård in 'The East'
Fox Searchlight Pictures
(From left) Brit Marling, Patricia Clarkson, Ellen Page and Alexander Skarsgård in 'The East'

A thriller of style and substance, “The East” follows an undercover security agent who infiltrates a cultlike collective of eco-vigilantes; the title comes from the name of the cell. Reversing our expectations, the tough, smart former FBI agent on the case is a woman, Sarah Moss (Brit Marling, who co-wrote the taut screenplay).

The radical environmentalists she's pursuing target CEOs of polluting corporations, exposing them to the very toxins their firms loose on nature and humanity. The opening intercuts scenes of the Gulf oil spill with The East's sludge-for-sludge retaliation in an executive's mansion.

The ethical battle lines are swampy. It's up to audience members to decide if the radicals are less criminal than the big shots who scatter poison indiscriminately.

The tension between the dictates of law and the demands of justice is just one of numerous stress points feeding the film's apprehensive chill. In her third outing as a film's star and screenwriter, the 30-year-old Marling has created a rich, multifaceted character. Sarah is earnestly religious, flawlessly proficient in spycraft, ambitious and guided by a solid moral compass. Her job requires her to lie to her live-in boyfriend (Jason Ritter) about everything, and she struggles with the duplicity.

The head of her global security firm is Sharon (Patricia Clarkson), a woman of cobra-like poise and elegant couture. With their near-rhyming names and blond, patrician physical resemblance, the two could be a discordant upper-class mother and daughter. Before awarding the plum assignment to Sarah, the manipulative Sharon puts her through an ordeal of sibling rivalry with other young field operatives.

The film's attention to physical and emotional detail is meticulous. We watch, impressed, as Sarah builds a cover identity that will make her seem a promising recruit for the eco-marauders. In a tattered wardrobe and artfully distressed sandals she joins the underclass of train-hoppers and dumpster divers. In time, she discovers The East's headquarters, a decrepit, abandoned house, deep in the woods.

Antagonistic true believer Izzy (Ellen Page) regards Sarah with suspicion. The leader, Benji (Alexander Skarsgård), takes a wait-and-see attitude, and humanitarian Doc (Toby Kebbell) is welcoming.

Director Zal Batmanglij, who co-wrote, lets the story unfold organically. We learn the personal motives that underlie some members' anger one step at a time. Batmanglij reveals that each situation is more complex than we first understood. With revenge scenarios that play out like low-tech “Mission: Impossible” capers and back-stabbing from Sarah's corporate overseer, Batmanglij never lets the tension go slack.

It takes a real suspension of disbelief to imagine that even a junior agent like Sarah would be so shocked to learn of corporate wrongdoing. Still, Marling is compelling as a righteous woman in the midst of a situation where both paths of action are wrong.

Colin Covert reviews movies for the Star Tribune (Minneapolis).

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.