'RED 2': Reunited, expanded, derivative
They bicker, emotionally blackmail each other, kiss and make up. Because they have history.
But Bruce Willis and John Malkovich aren't the “real” couple at the heart of “RED 2,” the action-comedy sequel about retired government assassins. They're just part of a love triangle, one that Mary Louise Parker completes. Her character Sarah may be Frank's (Willis) dizzy, but decreasingly naive, lady love, but Marvin (Malkovich) is the one who gullibly fills her in on this bloody, if exciting, life they've led and somehow continue to lead. And he's the one who gives her guns.
Frank is incredulous. But as the bullets fly and the plot thickens, once mild-mannered Sarah gets into the spirit of things entirely too quickly.
The joy of “RED” was seeing a cast packed with Oscar winners (Helen Mirren, Morgan Freeman, Richard Dreyfuss, Ernest Borgnine) and very good actors (Malkovich, Parker, Brian Cox and Karl Urban) flesh out and class up a Bruce Willis action film. “Codgers make the coolest killers” was its motto.
And, if anything, this “Retired, Extremely Dangerous” sequel ups the ante. They've replaced killed-off Oscar winners with Anthony Hopkins as an addled old scientist and Catherine Zeta-Jones as a Russian agent and one-time lady love of Frank's. And the change in directors to comedy-specialist Dean Parisot (“Galaxy Quest”) means there's a laugh a minute amid all this mayhem.
Somebody's Wikileaked info about a secret bomb project named “Nightshade” that Frank and Marvin were linked to decades before. Now, they need to survive the hitmen — played by Neal McDonough (“The Guardian”) and Korean actor and martial arts star Byung-hun Lee (“I Saw the Devil,” “G.I. Joe: Retaliation” ) — sent to get them. Frank and Marvin also have to find the mad scientist who built the bomb (Hopkins) to clear their names.
Frank drags Sarah along to Paris, Moscow and London as they do. Mirren returns as her droller-than-droll MI6 assassin, Brian Cox reprises his Russian spy boss. And David Thewlis shows up as a sadistic spy and snooty wine lover.
Some bit players are bland, but the difference between Willis in the more recent “Die Hards” and here is that of an exhausted old man forced to repeat himself and carry a movie, versus a lark where he gives action cred to supporting players who do the heavy, funny lifting.
It's a movie of hilarious reaction shots and scores and more scores of jokes. It's all ground we've sort of covered before and things do tend to drag before the too-violent third act turns too-bloody.
But “RED 2” goes down easily, from Malkovich's demented moments of relationship advice to Dame Helen's tender and amusing “Hitchcock” reunion with Sir Anthony. There's a knowing twinkle in their eyes, and in everybody else's.
“Yeah, we could've done a Bond film,” they seem to wink. “And it would've been a bloody fun one, at that.”
Roger Moore is a movie critic for McClatchy-Tribune News Service.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.