Woodley to shed locks for 'Fault in Our Stars' role
Get ready for quite the celeb transformation — for a good cause.
Shailene Woodley is shedding her signature long brown locks this weekend to prepare for her role in the upcoming movie adaptation of “The Fault in Our Stars,” which will begin filiming Aug. 26 in the Pittsburgh area. She's donating it and is starting a campaign for others to follow suit.
Woodley, 21, best known for her role in “The Descendants,” will be playing cancer patient Hazel Grace Lancaster, the sardonic teenage protagonist of John Green's best-selling young adult novel. She'll donate her hair to an organization called Children With Hair Loss, which makes wigs for children who lose hair due to cancer treatment or other diseases.
The announcement was made on Green's Tumblr page. Followers of the popular author, called “Nerdfighters,” are donating their hair in solidarity and posting photos using the #hairforhazeltag. Multiple fans have already posted before-and-after photos.
“Not only do i have the opportunity to externally shift my current establishment of self, but i have the blessed gift of donating my long locks to a wonderful organization who will then create a wig for someone in need. WHAT AN HONOR,” Woodley wrote on her personal Tumblr page. Woodley also is starring in the upcoming adaptation of Veronica Roth's “Divergent,” and is currently in the indie movie “The Spectacular Now.”
In the book, Hazel falls in love with a fellow patient in her cancer support group, Augustus Waters, who will be played by Ansel Elgort. Laura Dern and Sam Trammell (“True Blood”) will play Hazel's parents.
“The Fault in Our Stars” has been on USA Todays's Best-Selling Books list for 68 weeks, peaking at No. 4. The movie is due out in 2015.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Review: ‘Black or White’ finds dramatic promise in the grey areas of American race relations
- Review: ‘A Most Violent Year’ speaks softly, carries much menace
- Review: Law can’t manage to keep ‘Black Sea’ afloat
- Review: Cotillard shines in Dardennes’ moving social drama
- Review: A tired gimmick weakens thriller ‘Project Almanac’