'Act of Killing' blends movies, murder
There are moments in “The Act of Killing,” director Joshua Oppenheimer's documentary about the Indonesian death-squad leaders who presided over the government-backed executions of more than a million people in 1965, when you wonder if the filmmaker ever felt his life was in danger.
“Yes, there were moments when we were scared, especially whenever the (killers) had second thoughts about the film,” Oppenheimer says. “When I showed (executioner) Anwar Congo the scene on the roof where he re-enacts how he killed people with fishing wire, I was afraid he was going to say ‘I don't want to do this. This makes me look bad,' and call the paramilitary on us. During certain days of filming, I sent my Indonesian production manager to the airport with cash, ready to buy tickets for me and the entire crew in case we had to evacuate in a hurry. He would wait there until I sent him a text saying everything was OK.”
Oppenheimer originally intended to make a movie about the survivors of the massacre — the children of the intellectuals, farmers and ethnic Chinese who were branded communists, rounded up en masse and slaughtered after the Indonesian government was overthrown by the military. In 2005, he had already spent three years filming interviews with the survivors and living among them. But the army prohibited the survivors to go on the record with their experiences.
Instead, Oppenheimer decided to train his camera on the executioners, who today are treated as celebrities and patriots. For the next two years, the filmmaker interviewed 40 of the killers, who were happy to boast about their crimes.
“I wasn't trying to find the right ‘character' for a movie during that time,” Oppenheimer says. “I simply wanted to find out exactly what had happened and expose the impunity these men had enjoyed. Anwar was the 41st perpetrator I met, and he quickly became the focus of the movie. Some people have told me they think these men are psychopaths. But a psychopath is someone who doesn't feel remorse or empathy or compassion for other human beings. Anwar's problem is that he's not a psychopath. That's why life is so hard for him today, and that's what he's still struggling with.”
Before they were drafted by the government to carry out mass murders, Congo and his cohorts were “movie gangsters,” street-level thugs who would buy all the tickets of the latest Hollywood import in advance, then scalp them for profit. Their passion for Elvis Presley musicals and crime dramas from the era gave Oppenheimer the idea to have the men re-create the killings via short films — a musical, a horror picture, a gangster flick — in which they could relive their crimes from the point of view of their victims.
“The movie sets were a space where people's humanity came out,” Oppenheimer says. “While making this movie, (executioner) Herman Koto fell in love with acting and developed a professional actor's loyalty to the emotional and moral truth of whatever scene he's playing. Over the course of the five years, we spent shooting ‘The Act of Killing,' Herman came to realize that he's a tool of a corrupt and violent paramilitary movement. He became more and more angry at the organization and turned into this force of truth in the film. Herman plays an important role in the process of constantly bringing Anwar back to confront his pain. Anwar would get cold feet, and Herman would gently lead him back in.”
“The Act of Killing” has become a big hit in Indonesia, sparking fierce public debate and finally giving the media a forum to report on the genocide honestly, without fear of persecution. But the movie enraged the right-wing Pancalisa Youth paramilitary group, which was spawned during the massacres and whose members understandably hate the film for stripping them of their heroic airs.
“It is no longer safe for me to be in Indonesia,” Oppenheimer says. “I could get into the country, but I don't think I would get out. The film has come to Indonesia like the child in ‘The Emperor's New Clothes,' pointing out that the king is naked. Everybody knew it but had been too afraid to say it.”
Rene Rodriguez is a staff writer for The Miami Herald.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.