Upgrades have drive-in owners fretting for future
In his four decades in the movie-theater business, Jerry Salnoris has seen many changes. Technology has altered the way nearly everything works.
Now, Salnoris and hundreds of other drive-in owners are facing a change that's threatening to cause screens across the country to go dark.
“Changes have been expensive, but it's been nothing like this,” says Salnoris, owner of the Twin Hi-Way Drive-In in Robinson. “Unless we come up with a game plan, we could be history.”
Insiders anticipate the movie industry will switch from film to digital projection entirely by the end of the year. Upgrading can run around $70,000 per screen, theater owners say. That's not a cost many are in a position to pay.
To help at least a few, Honda has launched Project Drive-In, an online competition where folks can vote on their favorite theaters for a chance to win them a new digital projector. Votes also are accepted via text.
“Who better than a car company, and one like Honda, to help save this important piece of American car culture?” says Alicia Jones, manager of Honda & Acura Social Marketing. “With this project, we wanted to directly help drive-ins but also to shine a light on the issue these small businesses were facing and help build some awareness and buzz to help even more.”
Voting for the project continues through Sept. 21. Four winners will be announced Sept. 23. Honda already gave away five projectors in an earlier contest.
According to the project's website, there are 368 drive-ins left in America. Owners say, even in the age of technology, the show must go on.
“I echo so many other owners when I say we don't do this because we're making tons of cash,” says Salnoris. “We do it because we love it. Nothing compares to it.”
There are a few other options to keep businesses operating, owners say. Some are looking at leasing equipment. Others have considered appealing to the community with fundraisers.
Joe Warren, owner of the Evergreen Drive-In in Mt. Pleasant, says there's some first-generation used equipment on the market, but even that would have to be replaced if there are necessary upgrades in the future.
“Three of four years down the road, it won't be usable,” he says.
The best thing people can do to help, Warren says, is simply go to a movie. “You really have to support the drive-in — go and take your friends,” he says.
Brian Erwin, owner of the Comet Drive-In in Connellsville, says he's not sure the purchase is worth the time it would take to recoup its expense.
“I don't know that I want to work 30 more years to pay that back,” he says.
Erwin is considering updating just one of the Comet's two screens, but isn't sure that's even a viable long-term option.
“High-tech is wonderful, but is comes and goes so fast,” he says. “I don't know what the answers will be.”
Even as they're facing this hurdle, owners report a boost in business. The Riverside Drive-in in Vandergrift set a record this year with three sell-out nights in one week around the Fourth of July, owner Todd Ament says.
A series of popular children's flicks helped this year, as well, with “Monsters University,” “Despicable Me 2,” “Turbo,” “Smurfs 2” and “Planes” drawing in big crowds. Ament expects the same for the Sept. 27 release of “Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs 2.”
“This year was our best season by far,” Ament says.
The renewed interest in drive-ins is all the more reason owners are scrambling to find a solution to their projector woes.
“We can't let this piece of history slip away,” says Salnoris. “We can't let go without a fight.”
Rachel Weaver is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-320-7948 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Swank prefers characters who don’t care about their wrinkles
- Reese Witherspoon: How a scandal saved her career
- Review: Witherspoon loses her vanity and herself in ‘Wild’
- Review: Wallis, Jamie and Jay Z bring ‘Annie’ back to life