Murder from the back of a 'Blue Caprice'
By Roger Moore
Published: Thursday, Oct. 3, 2013, 6:47 p.m.
The shootings were so random — a parking lot, at a gas station, a guy mowing grass, a baby-sitter reading a book on a bus stop bench.
They happened in a spree — in Maryland, Virginia, greater Washington, D.C. — and set off a frantic manhunt and car hunt. He had to be a “disaffected white male.” He called in threats and warnings: “Your children are not safe, anywhere, at any time.”
Was the shooter driving a van? Or white truck?
No, it was a “Blue Caprice.” And the “shooter” was two black men, John Allen Muhammad and a teen he treated as his “son,” Lee Malvo.
“Blue Caprice” is a chilling portrait of motive, manipulation and mass murder. As Muhammad — never called by that name in Alexandre Moors' film — Isaiah Washington paints a portrait of brittle charm and embittered, bloody-minded grudges. We meet a doting father, see him take in a teen who has been abandoned by his mother, and then watch him use people, claim victimhood and eventually create a monster as his tool for revenge on a country this military vet felt had done him wrong. Washington is brilliant in the part — scary, mysterious, but not the least bit unfathomable.
The grown man meets the boy Lee (an intense-yet-vulnerable Tequan Richmond) in Antigua, and eventually takes him to Tacoma, Wash., where the ex-Army mechanic renews his friendship with an old service buddy.
Tim Blake Nelson is a rough, working-class gun aficionado — heading off into the woods to “let off some steam” by shooting any one of his large, unsecured collection of guns.
Washington, Moors and screenwriter R.F.I. Porto let us see the wheels begin to turn in Muhammad's head. He starts indoctrinating the teen with his vision for their exploits, the terror they will strike at the whole “house of cards” that Muhammad feels a random shooting spree will topple.
“Blue Caprice” can be faulted for its dry take on these characters and their actions. Moors is engrossed by the heist picture elements here, how they trained, Muhammad's rationale for picking random victims, part of his strategy that if it could be anybody carrying out these crimes, for any of a number of reasons, “we can be invisible.”
We get nothing of the longer version of Muhammad's own radicalization.
But “Blue Caprice” is as complete a portrait as the movies have given us of the disaffected among us, people whose sanity is as shaky as a house of cards, and the easy access to weapons and cultural anonymity that allows them to act out their dark fantasies of revenge on the unsuspecting.
Roger Moore is a staff writer for McClatchy-Tribune News Service.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.