ShareThis Page

Comparing 13 horror movies with remakes

| Sunday, Oct. 27, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

“Carrie” is the latest attempt to remake a classic horror movie, and the trend shows no signs of slowing. There are plans to remake everything from the classic “Rosemary's Baby” to the campy “Little Shop of Horrors.”

Remaking horror films has been going on for years, which means, when you decide to pick up a DVD to watch for Halloween, you'll need to be careful. In many cases, the original and remake don't have the same quality.

Here's a look at 13 horror films and their remakes to help you make a DVD pick that's more of a treat than trick.

”House of Wax”

1953: Vincent Price turned this 3-D film into a horror film classic.

2005: Paris Hilton made this remake very plastic.

”The Fly”

1958: Audiences screamed at the sight of a man's head on a fly's body.

1986: Audiences groaned at seeing Jeff Goldblum's body parts fall off.

”The Blob”

1958: Showed us a huge blob of goo could be quite scary.

1988: Showed us a film could be a huge glob of goofiness.

”House on Haunted Hill”

1959: Vincent Price produced rushes of adrenalin with the scares in a creepy mansion.

1999: Geoffrey Rush caused ticket buyers to fear they wouldn't get their money back at the box office.


1960: Alfred Hitchcock's masterpiece made us afraid of showers.

1998: Director Gus Van Sant's step-by-step remake made us feel like we needed a shower.

”Night of the Living Dead”

1968: George A. Romero's tale of zombies attacking a farmhouse defined the walking-dead genre.

1990: Tom Savini's tale of zombies was dead on arrival.

”The Texas Chainsaw Massacre”

1974: Director Tobe Hooper created a classic horror character with the chainsaw-wielding Leatherface.

2013: Director John Luessenhop created another reason to hate 3-D.

”The Shining”

1980: Jack Nicholson gave this creepy tale of a haunted hotel a chilling edge.

1997: Steven Weber gave the TV tale of a haunted hotel a dull edge.

”Friday the 13th”

1980: The Betsy Palmer film created the blueprint for the genre about teens being systematically killed.

2009: The Danielle Panabaker film created the blueprint for how to kill the genre about teens being systematically killed.

”My Bloody Valentine”

1981: Love means having to say “I'm sorry I didn't see that killer behind you.”

2009: Love means having to say “I'm sorry but this film is better because the violence reaches an absurd level.”

”The Evil Dead”

1981: Director Sam Raimi's tale of teens being killed in the woods gets a million scares from a few bucks.

2013: Director Fede Alvarez's tale of teens being killed in the woods gets a few scares from millions of bucks.

”The House On Sorority Row”

1983: College girls end up pledging De Cappa Tation.

2009: College girls end up pledging the sequel is better.

”Fright Night”

1985: Roddy McDowall makes this tale of a neighborhood vampire campy fun.

2011: Colin Farrell makes this tale of a neighborhood vampire scary fun.

Rick Bentley is a staff writer for The Fresno Bee (Fresno, Calif.)

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.