Younger Gleeson takes the lead in 'About Time'
Will “About Time” turn Domhnall Gleeson into a movie star?
At 30, the redheaded son of the great Irish actor Brendan Gleeson and brother of actor Brian Gleeson (“Snow White and the Huntsman”) seems on the cusp of it, parked front and center in a Richard Curtis (“Four Weddings and a Funeral”) romantic comedy.
In the film, in which he plays a young man who uses his inherited ability to travel backward to some specific point in his life for a “do-over,” Gleeson courts, recourts and wins Rachel McAdams — and has earned “agreeably quirky leading man” (The Hollywood Reporter) notices in doing it.
“It's the first time I've been front and center in a film that was bigger than something tiny and filmed and shown in Ireland,” Gleeson says from Australia, where he appeared at the film's premiere. A ginger-haired veteran of the “Harry Potter” franchise — he was one of the Weasley siblings — Gleeson hasn't had the sort of a career or life that begs for its own “do-overs.”
“I'm sure I'll get up to plenty later on that I'll regret at a later date,” he jokes. “The message of the film is that, if you're living your life properly, you shouldn't need to do anything over. Hopefully, you've paid attention to things as they were happening. Pay attention. When life surrounds you with beautiful things, realize it. Be there for it.
“Despite that message, the lovely reality of it all is that, every day, you probably do 10 things you wish you hadn't done. That's where the comedy lies.”
Following in his father's footsteps, Gleeson has worked with the great Irish playwright-turned-screenwriter-director Martin McDonagh. The younger Gleeson picked up a Tony nomination for his work in “The Lieutenant of Inishmore,” had a bit part in “Six Shooter,” the Oscar-winning short film that put his dad and McDonagh on the film industry's radar, and has a role in the next Gleeson-McDonagh team-up, “Calvary,” which Martin's brother John Michael McDonagh (“The Guard”) wrote and directed.
The McDonaghs aren't shy about tying their fates to the Gleesons. And that offers Domhnall (the Gaelic version of “Donald”) more chances to pair up with Pop.
“Acting with my dad is one of the great pleasures of my work,” he says. “Any day you get to go on set and spend time with a friend, a family member and one of your acting heroes is a pretty good day. I'm lucky to have had plenty of those.”
That helped him connect with his “About Time” dad, played by Bill Nighy, at his most sage and sanguine.
“Bill makes you cherish every moment on the set. You're paying attention to the greatness of every day in your life because that's what the movie is about. ... Playing father and son can be a very stressful thing, because it's meant to be a great, positive father-son relationship. Those are rare, in film, because drama comes from the stress in such a relationship. You've got a lot to live up to.
“My relationship with my dad is so special. Bill felt, in an instant, like somebody you could turn to for advice, somebody you could have a drink with. You feel you've been made better just for being around him.”
He's all bubbly, positive energy about the film and what it might mean to his career. Yes, there are “Hugh Grantisms” (The Guardian newspaper) in Gleeson's “About Time” performance. But that's a given, considering the track record of screenwriter and sometimes-writer-director Curtis (“Love Actually,” “Notting Hill”). Still, there is great chemistry with co-star Rachel McAdams.
“That's all on her,” Gleeson says. “Can you think of a film where she didn't have great chemistry with the leading man? I can't.”
And hit or miss, he hopes to take the life lessons, on and off screen, that “About Time” gave him into his acting future and into his heart.
“If you're not learning from people — my dad, Bill, Rachel, Richard — you're wasting your time.”
Roger Moore covers movies for McClatchy-Tribune News Service.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Review: ‘Me and Earl and the Dying Girl’ is a sweet take on a teen weeper
- DVD reviews: ‘The Forger’ and ‘Timbuktu’
- Review: Overstuffed plot spoils irreverent, silly ‘Ted 2’
- Review: ‘Felix and Meira’ no great surprise
- Review: A better-late-than-never ‘fashion icon’ takes a bow in ‘Iris’
- Review: ‘Max’ is touchy but clunky