TribLIVE

| AandE

 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

REVIEW: 'Catching Fire' is step up for franchise

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

‘The Hunger Games: Catching Fire'

★★★ (out of 4)

PG-13

Wide release

Pittsburgher movie quiz for yunz

Is 'Birdman' star Michael Keaton the best actor with western Pennsylvania ties? Click here to play the Trib's tongue-in-cheek attempt to find out.

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

By Bill Goodykoontz
Thursday, Nov. 21, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
 

Well this was unexpected: “The Hunger Games: Catching Fire” is a good movie.

Not an OK movie, like the first one, that seemed flat and somehow listless, even while tributes from 12 districts were slaughtering each other for the amusement of the masses. An actual good movie; having Jennifer Lawrence at the center of things helps immeasurably.

Yes, the film, based on the immensely popular Suzanne Collins novels for 'tweens, has plot holes and head-scratching motives galore. But it never forgets its target audience, and if the grown-ups have to raise an eyebrow every so often, so be it.

A switch in directors helps. Francis Lawrence takes over for Gary Ross, and immediately you realize that this somehow feels more like a big movie. Lawrence treats the film more like an event, and it shows.

“Catching Fire” picks up where “The Hunger Games” left off. In the games, young people compete in a reality show that is, in fact, a fight to the death. The last person standing wins.

It's an ill-disguised way for the fascist government, led by President Snow (Donald Sutherland), to keep its citizens oppressed. In “The Hunger Games,” Katniss Everdeen (Lawrence), the tribute from dirt-poor District 12, managed to win the games and engineer a way for her friend and fellow District 12 tribute Peeta Mellark (Josh Hutcherson) to also survive.

As Snow points out in a visit to Katniss' home early on, she is now a symbol of hope for many of the downtrodden. This won't do, so she and Peeta are sent on a winners' tour of all the districts, pretending to be in love. It's a disaster, touching off riots. Katniss' growing popularity is becoming a threat to the government, so Snow and new game designer Plutarch Heavensbee (Philip Seymour Hoffman) scheme to take her down one way or another.

This leads to a sort of Hunger Games: All-Star Edition, in which winners of previous games are forced to compete again. It seems like a pretty obvious way to get Katniss and Peeta back in the arena, and the set-up is the film's weakest segment.

But the competition introduces some welcome new additions, such as Jeffrey Wright and Amanda Plummer as a couple of high-I.Q. odd ducks, Jena Malone as a woman vividly unhappy to be called back and Sam Claflin as a handsome winner who has cashed in, in big ways.

Back from the first film are Woody Harrelson, Elizabeth Banks and Stanley Tucci; the latter is especially good (again) as the effusive host of a talk show about the games. His blindingly white teeth and purple hair are not what make him ridiculous; his manner, somehow cynical and sycophantic, is.

Knowing the competitors a little better helps a lot. We have people to root for, and against, and never lose that nagging feeling that no one can be trusted (because, in fact, no one can).

Not everything will be resolved by the end of the film. Quite the opposite, actually.

Things are, however, established and reconfirmed. One is Lawrence's continued screen presence, which is considerable. Another is Francis Lawrence's ability to get his arms around so unwieldy a story. (He's signed on for the final two installments.)

“Catching Fire” is a great leap forward for the franchise. Seeing as it's all about hope and what it represents, here's hoping the next two are just as good, if not better.

Bill Goodykoontz of the Arizona Republic is the chief film critic for Gannett.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Movies

  1. Pittsburgh company Elite Casino Events got its shot in ‘Southpaw’
  2. DVD reviews: ‘What We Do in the Shadows’ and ‘Tangerines’
  3. Review: Dimwitted ‘Pixels’ falls apart before it begins
  4. Review: A pugilist parable of transformation in ‘Southpaw’
  5. Review: ‘Paper Towns’ hits all the right John Hughes-inspired notes
  6. Fuqua, Gyllenhaal trained side-by-side for Pittsburgh-shot ‘Southpaw’
  7. Online viewing of previews boosts movie trailer-makers